While Vision Pro returns were uncommon, many came down to owners not figuring out its spatial computing.

Up to 30% of Apple Vision Pro Returns Are Because Users Don’t Get It, Analyst Says::While Vision Pro returns were uncommon, many came down to owners not figuring out its spatial computing.

  • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    35·
    9 months ago

    Because this thing has best on the market resolution, passthrough quality, and passthrough latency. And probably raw power for a standalone headset by a pretty good margin.

    • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.worldEnglish
      6·
      9 months ago

      Is it made to be used as part of the work done in a profession? For example, a “professional video camera” may have lots of extra features needed by people whose professions are video-related.

      Is this headset designed specially for professional use? If so, what profession? If not, then the term seems to be disingenuous marketing crap that devalues any other claims made by them.

      • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        21·
        9 months ago

        Pro has never meant that on products. It has always exclusively mean where it fits in their product stack.

        This is their high end product at a high end price point, and legitimately takes a shit on everything else you can buy at any price. They don’t have the non-pro yet because it can’t be done to an acceptable level without being just VR, and that’s not the point of what the Apple Vision is.

    • Shanedino@lemmy.worldEnglish
      1·
      9 months ago

      I would definetly agree, compared to the base apple vision (not pro version) this thing is very literally… infinitely better.