• HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m an ex-Mormon and Satanist, I’m largely a socialist, I am very pro-gun and would support revocation of the NFA of 1934, and also pro LGBTQ+, feminist, pro-abortion, in favor of raising top marginal tax rates to 95%, instituting wealth taxes on total assets owned or controlled in excess of $100M (and total seizure if convicted of trying to conceal the ownership), support revoking corporate personhood through constitutional amendment, I’m in favor if widespread public transit, and favor taxing oil companies out of existence to pay for it, support Ukraine without reservation, blah blah blah.

    I am unelectable for any political party in the US.

    • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Depending on how your gun policies are, I might be able to swallow that in exchange for everything else

      • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m generally in favor of the fewest possible restrictions; I’d rather change the cultural attitude and situations that lead to violence in the first place than restrict the tools that people use. Cramming tons of poor people with no hope for a better future into a very small area, for instance; that’s a pretty solid predictor of bad outcomes.

        First, I think that any costs associated with laws on gun ownership should be covered by income and wealth taxes. (I also think that state and national parks should be funded the same way; I oppose fee-based gov’t services. It’s it’s a public good that the gov’t should be performing, then it should be fully funded.)

        I would absolutely favor mandatory training for people that wanted to own firearms, but I’d also make sure that training was on-demand, easily accessed, and paid for by income taxes and not fees. (So, like, Cook County, IL couldn’t have only one class every month that meets 30 miles east of O’Hare at 3:30am on Tuesday morning, with a maximum of five spots open, all to make sure that very, very few people can legally own firearms.) I do generally think that people should know under what circumstances they can legally use lethal force, and I’d support free–as above–classes for anyone that wanted a carry permit. Carry permits should be free to people that have attended the classes. I support free universal background checks on all firearm transfers. I’d have to consult with how to make background checks on private transfers work, because I wouldn’t want Joe Schmoe holding onto a 4473 that I filled out–too much personal information–but I also don’t want the gov’t having a database of all private transfers that would become a de facto registry.

        I’m generally in favor of removing the rights from someone once they have been convicted of a violent offense, but not usually otherwise. (I think that ‘violent offense’ would need to be carefully defined so that states couldn’t e.g. redefine speeding as a violent offense.) I think red flag laws might be a good idea–people planning acts of mass murder usually ‘leak’ information in the days or weeks prior–but the way they’re currently implemented is not good at all, and it can take months to get your rights back.

        • Texas_Hangover@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Damned if I didn’t agree with most of your points. Common sense is a hell of a thing, yet so rare.

  • PeterPoopshit@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Weed. I want to make thc drug tests for any reason including employment illegal just to see if it really does cause the world burn or not (it won’t)

      • DokPsy@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        *Except the food industry. No restaurant or bar is dumb enough to drug test. They wouldn’t have any workers

        • Texas_Hangover@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s getting that way for warehousing too, besides pre-hire screening (which, if you ain’t savvy enough to slide past one of those you can fuck off anyway.) 20 years ago we got tested for looking at the boss funny, these days you have to REALLY fuck something up to get tested lol.