• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Primarily occupied? No. Because I never made that claim. Feel free to quote me. Since, you know, I’m the liar here.

    • atetulo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Then there is no discussion. My argument ever since your reply has been that the phenomenon that you pointed out can only happen in major cities: people working full-time but can’t afford living quarters.

      Yeah, of course a homeless person without a job needs more money. I’m not referring to them because there’s honestly no point to. You knew I wasn’t referring to them, which is why you had to specify some of the people there were working full-time jobs.

      I’m referring to the people working jobs who feel they should get paid more while people around the world work harder for less. Those are the ones I do not take seriously.

      You, the liar that you are, posted a picture of people living in tents then said some of them have full-time jobs? How much is some? And to those some, I am specifically referring that their money would go further outside of major cities.

      Anyways. This entire argument is in bad faith. I can tell you’re the kind of person who thinks more money is the solution to all working class problems. It isn’t.

      Gonna block you now.