EdenRester@kbin.social to World News@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoIndigenous Voice: Australians reject historic Indigenous referendum - BBC Newsbbc.inexternal-linkmessage-square98fedilinkarrow-up1142arrow-down13file-text
arrow-up1139arrow-down1external-linkIndigenous Voice: Australians reject historic Indigenous referendum - BBC Newsbbc.inEdenRester@kbin.social to World News@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square98fedilinkfile-text
Australian national broadcaster ABC has projected three states voted No, effectively defeating the referendum.
minus-squareMxM111@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoI was not talking about legality.
minus-squarehitmyspot@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoThat’s odd, as your first sentence talks about laws. Maybe you said something you didn’t mean.
minus-squareMxM111@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoOne can talk about laws and yet not discuss their legality, but their morality.
minus-squarehitmyspot@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoYes, one can. You however were comparing comparison under laws, which is speaking about legalities. You were incorrect. Doubling down just makes it clear you are not discussing in good faith, but have been caught in a lie.
I was not talking about legality.
That’s odd, as your first sentence talks about laws. Maybe you said something you didn’t mean.
One can talk about laws and yet not discuss their legality, but their morality.
Yes, one can. You however were comparing comparison under laws, which is speaking about legalities. You were incorrect. Doubling down just makes it clear you are not discussing in good faith, but have been caught in a lie.