Parents told to delete social media apps to prevent kids from seeing Hamas atrocities — Facebook, X, TikTok and other social media services have been filled with graphic imagery::American and Israeli parents say they have received messages from schools, temples, synagogues and peers following the Hamas terror attack urging them to delete social media applications off their kids’ phones.

  • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The only way to stop kids seeing bad videos on the internet is not let them on the internet.

    • Guy Dudeman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      Israel’s social media propaganda campaign has been super well-funded and is geared to really make people think that Hamas are the only bad guys here.

      Just last night I was watching youtube with my kids and there was a commercial that showed horrible stuff in support of Israel.

      • SmashingSquid@notyour.rodeo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah I got those ads multiple times last night along with a random maga conspiracy ad about how a bad event is happening soon and everyone should buy gas masks.

        • paraphrand@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Holy shit. I’ve had premium since the start of YouTube red. I had no idea YouTube ads were like this now.

          I’m used to when it was things like “Here in my garage.”

          • hardcoreufo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sometimes the ads are an hour long and full of the most right wing conspiracy nonsense. Those always come on if I fall asleep watching a video.

    • Candelestine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      tbf, getting it off the major mainstream platforms would make it less likely for the really young’uns to stumble on it.

    • keefshape@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are ways to teach and prevent the atrocities of war, without subjecting someone to those atrocities first or second hand.

      The world needs fewer folks with PTSD, thanks. Not more.

      • KᑌᔕᕼIᗩ@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        This sort of content is also not good for folks with PTSD either. Personally, I have to spend quite a bit of effort avoiding it if I want to continue to consume online content when things flare up in the world.

        • keefshape@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I agree, and hope my prior post didn’t indicate otherwise.

          I am very much advocating from a point of PTSD understanding, and prevention.

          20 some odd years ago, stupid naive me didn’t turn off one of those post 911 beheading videos. Even just typing that out puts me on the edge still.

          • KᑌᔕᕼIᗩ@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oh I didn’t mean to insinuate that you didn’t, I was just trying to support what you said with more context too.

            This has been a huge propaganda campaign and it’s disgusting.

    • lea@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Being informed about war? Sure, but

      It has come to our attention that deeply disturbing videos, including footage of hostages, may be spread across social media in the near future.

      This is not something you want to be exposed to, especially in your developmental years. As someone who grew up with unfiltered internet access looking at these things, take this seriously and protect your children.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      This divorces it from context. There is no point showing children context-free images of atrocities except to terrify them. Even within context, it’s really not the best thing to show children under a certain age. My family is Jewish and my father lived through WWII in Britain waiting to be invaded and thrown into a concentration camp, so he made sure I saw Holocaust images when I was pretty young and I can’t look at images of atrocities anymore because they disturb me too much and give me vivid nightmares. I even have trouble with horror movies. I basically avoid them. That’s not how you let a child know what war is or what genocide is.

    • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’d be a damn shame if your kids saw what the world you brought them into is like.

  • Bappity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    if any kids are still on twitter it’s 100% the parents fault at this point. the place is a shithole

  • Schwim Dandy@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not saying this sarcastically but with honest confusion, is the warning from an entity or group that hasn’t spent a lot of time on the internet? I’m not young by any stretch of the imagination and people have had very easy,almost accidental access to horrific imagery and media since the advent of the internet. Fake titled gore on Napster, image boards, etc.

    I will say the quality/detail of the content has gotten disturbingly more clear. That part makes it more disturbing to me. The Ukraine community has a shocking amount of drone video where it’s like a front row seat to the last seconds of someone’s life.

      • z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’d imagine kids are lacking a lot in terms of high quality critical thinking within the majority of educational institutions right now.

        But circumventing their parents and teacher’s technical prowess is one of their strengths. This is a nothingburger. Unless the kid’s parents work in tech and know how to block sites at a router level, they probably have nothing on their kids.

        And even then, heading to a place with public wifi and hanging out with your friends who still do have the apps is still gonna happen.

        As far as censorship, I personally think kids should be exposed to more adult related material while supervised by their loved ones. Not ALL adult related material, but we have to be realistic. The world of tomorrow is likely to be more harsh than it is today, to put it mildly. And the children of today need to be psychologically prepared for that so that they can adapt more readily for the world of tomorrow.

        Again, just my two cents, and while I’ve coached and taught kids in the past, I’m not a parent myself, so take my opinion with a hefty grain of salt.

        • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Lmmfao!

          I can count on one thumb how many kids in my kid’s grade can do shit to bypass parental controls on devices at all.

          That one kid tried, and failed. Also, router level blocking isn’t that hard.

          But, I’m with you on using it as teaching. You wanna have access to Facebook, we sit down and talk about it, learn the good and bad of it, what to watch out for, etc. Because you’re dead right, all it takes is one other kid without restrictions and a device they’re willing to share. It’s much better to teach your kids than just block them from things.

        • jandar_fett@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I agree. There should probably be a line drawn, but I think it’s important for children of a certain age, that can process it is, get small doses of the real world is actually like and what needless suffering looks like, so they’re prepared for the future and can just have empathy for others in general instead of living inside a bubble.

  • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I haven’t seen a single graphic image of the conflict in at least 4 hours of swiping the past day or two.

  • Krompus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The messages from schools and Jewish religious institutions underscore the sense of fear that has taken root worldwide after Hamas terrorists stormed into Israel on Saturday, killing hundreds of people. Israel’s counteroffensive has killed hundreds thousands of people in Gaza and the Israeli-occupied West Bank.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    American and Israeli parents say they have received messages from schools, temples, synagogues and peers following the Hamas terror attack urging them to delete social media applications off their kids’ phones.

    “It has come to our attention that deeply disturbing videos, including footage of hostages, may be spread across social media in the near future,” a principal at a public school in New York City said in an email this week, quoting from a message she said had been forwarded to her.

    The messages from schools and Jewish religious institutions underscore the sense of fear that has taken root worldwide after Hamas terrorists stormed into Israel on Saturday, killing hundreds of people.

    TikTok, which has community guidelines barring violent content, plans to add another layer of protection to the platform amid the conflict, including additional moderation resources, blocking hashtags that promote violence and proactive fact-checking around misleading narratives, according to a spokesperson for the Chinese-owned service.

    In recent years, leading social media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter have come under intense scrutiny for hosting video, photo and audio content that might be harmful to teenagers and children, including images related to terrorism, gun violence, suicide and self-harm.

    In response, some platforms have rolled out stricter parental controls, assembled moderation teams and invested in automated systems designed to quickly spot harmful content.


    The original article contains 778 words, the summary contains 222 words. Saved 71%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    lol, Zionist media pretending Israel isn’t currently pushing Palestine into the sea like they always said they would.

    • paintbucketholder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Wait, I don’t get this argument.

      You’re saying parents are cool with it if their kids see atrocities committed by Israel, but as soon as a Palestinians terrorist group commits atrocities, parents don’t want their kids to see it - implying parents want to protect the reputation of Hamas?

      • dmonzel@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        implying parents want to protect the reputation of Hamas?

        Wow, you totally missed the point. OP is implying parents shouldn’t be ok with Israeli violence, as well as not ok with Palestinian violence.

        Edit: lol at my follow up comments being deleted. To the mod that did so, I’m sorry for pointing out the fact that the person I was replying to is either unable to comprehend basic English, or is trolling.

        Because they were removed, I’ll type up the sanitized version: the parent comment is pointing out the author of the article is singling out Palestinian violence, but is ignoring the violence, the genocide, being carried out by the Israeli government and the IDF.

        • paintbucketholder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          OP is implying parents should be ok with Israeli violence, but not ok with Palestinian violence.

          Parents should want their kids to see violence committed by Israel, but they should want their kids to not be able to see violence committed by Palestinians?

          Why?

          Because they were removed, I’ll type up the sanitized version: the parent comment is pointing out the author of the article is singling out Palestinian violence, but is ignoring the violence, the genocide, being carried out by the Israeli government and the IDF.

          You’re still not making sense.

          If this is a pro-Israel, anti-Palestinian propaganda plot, then why should parents want their kids to see the violence, the genocide, that is being carried out by the Israeli government and the IDF, but not the atrocities and the terrorism committed by the Palestinians and by Hamas?

          • dmonzel@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m not sure how many times I can say it. The point is the singling out of one, and staying silent about the other. It’s about the hypocrisy. I’m not sure why this is so difficult, friend.

            • paintbucketholder@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s not that you’re not saying it often enough, it’s that you’re stopping halfway through what’s being proposed here.

              You’re seeing it as a one-sided, negative thing for the Palestinian side that the atrocities of Hamas are being “singled out” - but you’re completely ignoring the fact that they’re being “singled out” in order to be hidden from children.

              This means that children would never learn - at least not on their own, via social media - of these atrocities committed by Hamas. That would appear like a net positive for the Palestinian side.

              You’re getting caught up in the “singling out” part while ignoring the “in order to hide it from children” part.

              • dmonzel@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                This means that children would never learn - at least not on their own, via social media - of these atrocities committed by Hamas. That would appear like a net positive for the Palestinian side.

                That’s where your confusion is. This isn’t to hide what’s happening to make Hamas look good. This is about removing violent content. What the parent commenter and I are saying is that there’s no mention of the violence the IDF are perpetrating, as if it isn’t happening.

                I’ve now reached a point where I’ve said it as plainly as possible. If you’re still not able to comprehend what’s being said after this, I don’t know what else to tell you.

            • paintbucketholder@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s an argument, sure.

              It just doesn’t make a lot of sense to me, at least if presented as an argument criticizing Israel.

              “We want kids to see all the atrocities committed by our side, but none of the atrocities committed by our enemies” would at the very least be an unconventional approach to war time propaganda.

              You know what I’m getting at?

        • L3s@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Just want to point you to rule 3, that is the reason for removing the other comments.

          Thanks for cleaning it up in your edit.

  • Lysergid@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Oh no kids can get to know how fucked up is this world. Maybe parents should’ve think about it when they were buying smartphone to 5 years olds

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Imagine having zero sympathy for literal children seeing mangled up corpses because their parents bought them a phone.