China, if you’re listening…

Interesting, never heard of that. I’ve certainly obtained EINs that begin 95-…

Reserved for employer identification numbers.

And if we have another 2016, Trump can appoint Thomas and Alito’s successors, and maybe some more, with more Federalist Society hacks.

Well yeah, the decision was leaked early.

Sure, Dems absolutely should have codified it. However, a federal law protecting abortion rights as health care against the religious freedom of a regional Catholic hospital’s beliefs not to save a mother’s life with an abortion would be the test case and I’m pretty sure I know how 5 of the Justices would vote. This SCOTUS know they have unchecked power and are no longer afraid to wield it.

As if these zealots wouldn’t have ruled it unconstitutional or slowly weakend it with a series of cases anyway. See recent decisions gutting Voting Rights Act, weakening the Clean Water Act, Campaign Reform Act of 2002, Dodd-Frank and other federal laws.

As opposed to some dipshits getting carte blanche to disenfranchise voters in bad faith because the other candidate won.

Trusts and estates for high net worth clients.

My comment is that this is already a rogue court when the case aligns with their beliefs.

They literally ruled in one case this term with a fake situation that never happened ( 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis) and then lied about the background facts in another (Kennedy v Bremerton), both in favor of “injured” Christians.

And stealing funds from charities which resulted in shutting down your eponymous foundation.

Pretty sure a SCOTUS justice said that they can’t trust prosecutors to not do this just a month ago.

And the Supreme Court waited until he was no longer president to call it moot.

He could even say something like, “Won’t someone rid me of this me of this meddlesome jackass?”

I bet their wrists are quite sore now.