In China this is used for healthcare and more precise robotics. In the west this technology will be used for fleshlights and sexbots.
I tell terrible jokes.
In China this is used for healthcare and more precise robotics. In the west this technology will be used for fleshlights and sexbots.
You described it as both “stationary” and a “factory robot” and then describe how it can be moved and performs non-factory tasks. What the fuck were you expecting from something like this? The fucking Terminator or like C3PO or something? Yes, it’s a household appliance that can perform many complex(for a machine) household tasks on its own, just needing to be rolled into place and told to do them, if you can’t see how that would be useful to people, especially the elderly, then you’re an absolute fucking moron.
But I know why you have a problem with this. If this was a “Tesla” robot, you’d be cumming in your pants at how “advanced” it is. We see you for what you are, you racist, western chauvinist piece of shit.
The third line is literally describing it performing household tasks. Not factory work. You could’ve at least pretended to have read the article before making a smug mess in the comments.
A Trump presidency could actually be the best thing for the American people, simply because the libs will actually have to face the fucked up bullshit their government is doing, instead of burying their heads in the sand.
But it will make comfortable smug white westerners feel better about their own laziness and lack of morality.
TBH, whenever I hear an American “AI expert” say something, I have a knee jerk reaction to assume the opposite. Though pulling ahead of the smoke and mirrors “AI” that US companies do isn’t exactly a challenge.
I could never get into Persona 3, but I loved 4 and 5, they all have some pretty damn good music.
I see, I haven’t played it very much yet, so it seems like most other FPS games with an added “number go up” part. I haven’t really tried to play it without guns, but the hacking stuff does seem pretty neat, if I finish this playthrough and want a second playthrough I’ll probably try and focus on using guns as little as possible.
I’ve been playing it a bit recently, I didn’t get it when it came out. It’s…fine? Like it’s not a game with gripping social satire or anything, it’s just a vague sort of shooty bang bang sort of game, if you like FPS games with RPG elements, you’ll probably like it.
Capitalism vs socialism in action. Socialism seeks to use the new technology to make people’s jobs easier and more efficient, capitalism tries to use it to replace workers and provide distractions.
See, this is what algorithms should be used for. Collating data on complex networks so it is easier for people to assess and fix problems. It’s a tool, not a cure-all magical solution.
I wouldn’t really say this is 4-Chan adjacent though? 4-Chan made a knock off pokemon game in the past, and it’s about as bad as you’d expect. I’m seriously starting to think I’m playing an entirely different game to everyone else here, I just haven’t seen the stuff people are upset about. The text of the game is very edgy, but the gameplay is just fairly generic. It could maybe be a statement about video games and pokemon in general maybe, but I wouldn’t even give them that much credit. The writing just feels lazy, to try and be edgy for edgy’s sake, but the gameplay doesn’t at all, it feels more tacked on than anything else. It’s barely in the game.
But again, maybe I’m not seeing the same thing other people are and I’m not entirely sure why I’m missing these things if they’re so obvious to other people who have played it. This isn’t me saying “everyone else is wrong” rather, it’s me asking “Why am I not seeing this thing other people are seeing?”
It’s more strange than anything else to me. Feels like I downloaded an entirely different game to everyone else. There is edgy text on some loading screens and descriptions in the game, and that’s about it really. It’s like the person writing the game and steam description and the people actually designing the gameplay never actually interacted at all. The game just says “Wow, this is so horrible, aren’t we so cool and edgy?” but the gameplay isn’t really like that at all. As I said somewhere else, this isn’t subtext, it’s just text, and if I didn’t know what the advertising was like I’d assume it’s a bad translation before assuming the guy doing the writing was just an edgy loser. Feels more like a marketing gimmick more than anything else, as if they just had the cutesy discount pokemon and the text was just fairly generic, it wouldn’t have gotten nearly the attention it did. It’s controversy for controversy’s sake more than anything else.
The game itself is fine, it’s a fun, if fairly generic “survival” sort of game with heavy base building mechanics. But the memes about it all became about “edgy pokemon with guns and brutality” so this very PG sort of game is being treated like some R rated gorefest by idiots trying to be funny because their favourite youtuber made a joke about it. So naturally CHUDs love it because they get an excuse to be openly horrible.
“China to circumvent ban by tricking the US by naming chips “freedom fries” instead.”
He’s using the royal “We!” He’s a Monarchist! Get him!
If China does beat them to the moon this time, the US will just insist it “doesn’t count” because “we got there first anyway.” There isn’t as much danger to their national pride from losing this as you might think, Americans are masters of moving the goalposts.
They’ve pumped, time for the dump.