Robinson, the controversial candidate with former President Donald Trump’s backing

Robinson accused Martin Luther King, Jr. of being a “communist,” called pop star Beyoncé a “devil worshipper” said he missed the days when women could not vote, quoted Nazi dictator Adolf Hitler and referred to gay people as maggots.

I wish I was still shocked and surprised by this type of reveal.

Or “PutErUpWhere”

deleted by creator

My sister-in-law was diagnosed a couple of years ago. It has only improved the quality of her life by allowing her to work with her doctor on a treatment plan that has mitigated the health issues she used to struggle with.

She is currently looking at going for a PhD in the field of her chosen career.

I am so confused.

George Will

Who? Has he played a significant role in past elections and I’ve never noticed?

and baseball fan

Why? Why is this part of this story? It makes me want to care even less. Is that the point?

All it took was for someone to ask.

Correction, it takes people listening, which I doubt anybody involved in Project 2025 intends to do. At least not to women.

But they are okay with him being a vile extremist troll?

I left Private Internet Access (PIA) for Proton VPN after the Kape acquisition years ago. Still happy with my decision and I recommend Proton VPN to anybody in the market for personal VPN services.

Relevant Ferris Bueller Wisdom

I suspect that this may be partially a result of a recent post of mine that some may considered to be in bad taste. So this response is likely to be a bit biased.

For what it is worth, I considered tagging mine as NSFW but ultimately decided it was not necessary. I thought the image was very clearly a staged representation of drug use. Similar to how the Eric Andre meme is clearly a staged representation of murder. Further, there was no blood nor any indication of physical injury and I liked it to an image of somebody smoking pot or drinking to excess.

Do I think drug use alone require a NSFW tag? No.

Should drug coupled with blood, gore, physical injury, exploitation, etc? Possibly.

I just stated watching The Goes Wrong Show on Amazon. Not sure if I would appreciate more than 1 episode a night, but the first one had me laughing so hard I couldn’t breathe.

Reasons people may give a shit:

• The US government is shoveling huge amounts of money towards an individual that dismisses and devalues half of the world’s population with an active sexual harassment suit against him.

• Consumers might want to know if they are supporting if they are supporting a mysogynist by using his privately owned social media service or buying energy products / vehicles from a company he heads up as CEO.

• Trump has announced an intention to have this man lead a new “Government Efficiency Commission” and this behavior reflects both on Trump for the sort of people he elevates into positions of power and reflects on Musk as a potential public servant.

Threatening to impregnate a woman is not a good tactic for a man who is currently fighting a sexual harassment.

It’s a screen shot from this “flour in hairdryer” prank. Skip to about the 1:30 mark to see where the prank goes wrong.

This guy wouldn’t even vote for his own daughter’s best interests. That says alot. Both about his fucked up priorities and the state of the republican party.

Are they trying to hide behind a “I didn’t know what I was saying” defense while expecting people to trust and listen to what they say?

From the AP News article on the topic

One unidentified influencer’s contract included a $400,000 monthly fee, a $100,000 signing bonus and an additional performance bonus.

Such savage victimization. I’m sure that they returned all the money once they learned what it was for and where it came from.

There’s a lot of anxiety about what Trump does to Republican ability to win in 2028

They think that he won’t try again if he looses and he is still alive in 2028?

If only there was something that they could have done to stop him from running at all. Like maybe one or two opportunities to have him impeached that they could have seized in the past.

There is just this concern that like, ‘OK, if the party just goes in that direction, then what kind of party is it going forward?

And yet no thoughts of “what kind of party is it that allows this situation to happen twice”.

The outlet also claims concerned Republicans hope Trump’s loss is by a wide margin in order to help stifle any attempts to cast doubt on the legitimacy of his hypothetical defeat.

I bet that “wide margin” they are looking for would be easier if they stopped rigging the system to suppress and underrepresent opposition voters.

Have they solved the racial bias issues that has plagued facial recognition systems?

You aren’t necessarily wrong. Have you ever seen Friends without a laugh track?