• 1 Post
  • 135 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 6th, 2023

help-circle




  • Noted

    I don’t really listen to audiobooks but it’s always good to know.

    Also what’s your opinion on the rest of the trilogy that neuromancer is part of? I have the second book as well as my gf bought it but she didn’t have the courage/will to actually read it after neuromancer. Just curious

    And yes I’ll let you know how it goes :)

    We got our own book club in this thread haha (at least what I read)


  • Hey!!

    Contact is read!!

    I really liked it. In a story about ET contact, the focus is basically almost 100% on humans but I actually liked the approach. Halfway there were some chapters where it went on some tangents and it seemed weird filler but by the end it all wrapped up rather nicely.

    It was also a much easier read, having taken like 1/10 of the time Red Mars took me.

    I’ll probably read Neuromancer next, even if my gf found it a hard read.








  • At work atm so I’ll keep it succinct but definitely the giant cast of mostly uninteresting characters. The politics were actually quite ok but I usually like that sort of things.

    Also sometimes he goes on these long paragraphs were he describes all the driving instructions in mars and expecting the reader to have lived on Mars for 10 years as well XD

    He also gave as much emphasis to a teenager-like love drama as to a global scale terrorism operation which is, let’s say interesting





  • Yes

    People here and on Reddit really think that polls are made with just a few calls and then some average/extrapolation and that’s it.

    Meanwhile it’s an entire field with a lot of complex math and people with more knowledge about it than everyone in this comment section combined.

    And then the classic “polls are shit, they always get it wrong”. By definition polls are correct because they just represent an objective data set. Then they translate it into a phrase that we humans can (somewhat) understand but people then take it wrongly.

    They read “Poll X says candidate Y will win” when instead they should read “According to the data obtained for Poll X, candidate Y has a Z% chance of winning with a confidence level of W%”. And that isn’t wrong unless someone wants to find the mistake in the math.