All of this user’s content is licensed under CC BY 4.0.

  • 73 Posts
  • 570 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: October 20th, 2023

help-circle








  • Honestly, from a day to day standpoint, by my experience of using both, there’s little practical difference between, for example, yay, and paru — it mostly just ends up coming down to subjective, nitpicky meta things about the program itself.

    Up until this post, I hadn’t heard of Aura, but, after briefly looking at its repo, it appears that it’s effectively the same as yay and paru [1.2]; what it tries to do differently is it tries to ensure that there are translations of it (I’m guessing its output) in other languages [1.1.1]. One thing that I’m knee-jerk not super fond of is that it utilizes its own centralized metadata server [1.1.2], though I admit that I haven’t thought about that a great deal, so perhaps there are some aspects that about it that I’m missing, or perhaps misunderstanding, or perhaps there’s a different way to view it.

    References
    1. README.md. fosskers/aura. GitHub. Accessed: 2024-11-03T05:53Z. https://github.com/fosskers/aura/blob/master/README.md.
      1. Section: “The Aura Philosophy”.
        1. Section: “Multilingualism”.

          […] From the beginning, Aura has been built with multiple-language support in mind […]

        2. Section: “Independence”.

          Aura has its own […] Metadata Server called the Faur. The Faur in particular helps reduce traffic to the main AUR server and allows us to provide unique package lookup schemes not otherwise available.

      2. Section: “What is Aura?”.

        Aura is a package manager for Arch Linux. Its original purpose was in supplementing Pacman to support the building of AUR packages […].


  • That isn’t what I meant — if I am understanding your comment to mean that you thought that I was saying that skincare is feminine so people who avoid feminine things should avoid skincare. I was saying that people shouldn’t fear something due to its perceived femininity or masculinity — the hypothetical fact that skincare is feminine should be of no consequence to one’s own interest in it.



  • Men, it’s okay to care about your skin. It’s not feminine, it’s human.

    I find the “feminine” premise of this argument silly. So what if it is feminine? Is there something inherently wrong with femininity? It’s one thing to simply be somewhere on the spectrum of femininity and masculinity, but it’s another to fear that position and to force another based on one’s insecurity of the perceptions of others.