Oh, did I miss it? Was it recently?
Oh, did I miss it? Was it recently?
Ooh, that’s really cool.
I’ve played very good demos in the past where I would have liked to write a positive review [without buying the game or reviewing the full game].
Being able to add them to the library as “play later” (eventually, right?) is a very good addition too.
I agree in principle, I would often prefer descriptions over comparisons (as a reader/discoverer).
But I believe that these comparisons work. And they work well. Otherwise they wouldn’t be and still be so prevalent.
Usually they are comparisons / relations to very popular titles. If people know those titles, they immediately get a representation and imaginary picture of what the game is about.
A more direct description requires interpretation and creativity to assess, understand, and imagine.
I personally think it’s better, and can spark better and more personal interest (e.g. from the example “cozy” and “power washing”). But regularly seeing comparisons tells me many others don’t.
They’re going Rogue-like!
no no no, this is the wrong way around
because sales and marketing sell it before it even exists
Some additional info: Free trial, 120 € / year personal license.
looks like this character has fun being in the game
Unfortunately no mention of Outlook desktop
on 26.03.204
Man, the year 204 is so long ago
A door into another dimension?
Have you tried clicking on rhythm? Have you tried different rhythms?
Webcrawlers count as users too, right?
I scale by dropping requests
be way too heavy to even take off
maybe the engines would take off by themselves
I see, TIL. That’s different from Germany, where Ingenieur is a protected term.
The term engineering is not about problem-solving, especially when differentiated from development. Engineering is about deliberate understanding and decision-making, about giving it an architecture, a structure.
You can develop without any structure, solving an issue, without understanding a bigger context or picture or behavior. But that’s not engineering.
Driving a train is engineering?
Turned into a skeleton in 10 minutes
I think the guideline should be: future software should be written on a whim
well… as much trust as you can get back after such activities.