I always thought panache was more of something you could add to yourself like a fancy coat.
Like a feather boa would give someone panache but maybe charisma would be the ability to attract with a smile. I know nothing, just guessing.
I came over from a long-time lurker reddit account when Apollo shut down. I have really enjoyed my time here so far and I hope to contribute some fun content when I can.
I always thought panache was more of something you could add to yourself like a fancy coat.
Like a feather boa would give someone panache but maybe charisma would be the ability to attract with a smile. I know nothing, just guessing.
deleted by creator
That’ll be 3 Lira
A trumpet properly played cuts directly to that bittersweet, blue part of my soul.
deleted by creator
I bought Rimworld in 2015 on a Steam Christmas Sale and I finally played it this last year.
Breaking news: it’s really fun lol
Soooo Spider-Man won every major category? Great lol
I enjoyed Cyberpunk at launch. Forgive me…
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Things I learned today. I thought it was Saudi Arabia and had to look it up.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_oil_production
Really great video on the bikes!
I was not excited for this show until seeing that trailer! Fingers crossed 🤞
Invincible Ignorance Fallacy maybe?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invincible_ignorance_fallacy
The invincible ignorance fallacy,[1] also known as argument by pigheadedness,[2] is a deductive fallacy of circularity where the person in question simply refuses to believe the argument, ignoring any evidence given. It is not so much a fallacious tactic in argument as it is a refusal to argue in the proper sense of the word. The method used in this fallacy is either to make assertions with no consideration of objections or to simply dismiss objections by calling them excuses, conjecture, etc. or saying that they are proof of nothing, all without actually demonstrating how the objection fit these terms. It is similar to the ad lapidem fallacy, in which the person rejects all the evidence and logic presented, without providing any evidence or logic that could lead to a different conclusion.
Red-herring refers to a deliberately misleading clue. Gish gallop might be closer, it’s when you make a bunch of claims at once to overwhelm your opponent without regard to the validity of the claims. It’s not quite willful ignorance either. Hmmm…
I love pedantic stuff like this so I’m pretty sure I will be thinking about this the rest of the day now… thanks lol
deleted by creator
Ah man, not really out of the blue but sad to see him go. Fairytale of New York is still my favorite Xmas song. Sláinte!
Thank you :)
Really appreciate this comment, thank you!
That’s wild! At that point is the hobby flying or building/designing sim cockpits?