There’s mixed evidence of whether or not mass shootings have a contagion effect, that people who are already “primed” see this shit on tv and decide that today’s the day.
Or it could just be chance.
But maybe, here’s an idea, we don’t let people who make terroristic threats have guns. I don’t care about what kind of gun, if you credibly threaten to murder a bunch of people, no gun for you.
Yeah as someone who uses both this is really not much of a feature.
Women are so good and I love it and I’m so proud professional cunning frigid demanding
In this case, yes. Visually indistinguishable from a photo is considered CSAM. We don’t need any new laws about AI to get these assholes. Revenge porn laws and federal CSAM statutes will do.
Maybe try reading about the 1920s attempt and get back to us on if you still feel that way.
The punishment is known. Feed him to Zizek.
If you can send Pitbull to Kodiak, Alaska…
People on the Internet will vote for all kinds of stupid nonsense. At least the Alaska visit was funny.
Well, now my day is ruined. Although I guess this means French Guyana probably still counts.
Maybe we’ll have a nice Article 5 party this time.
There have been a few articles on “herding” which I didn’t even know about before this election. I am no pollster, but it sounds like there’s a huge incentive to protect the reputation of the polling firm (“it’s a draw, so we can’t be wrong”) vs reporting numbers they think might make news.