Beehaw is looking to shut down and or completely defederate.
They already de-federated 447 instances, I doubt that will make much difference.
Beehaw is looking to shut down and or completely defederate.
They already de-federated 447 instances, I doubt that will make much difference.
As someone who mostly likes those things, that does seem to be a big problem here.
Wait until you see what the GNU/Linux sublemmy (lem?) is called.
Aren’t our roads generally much narrower than most other countries.
Make each user function as an instance, to solve the mess of netsplits/defederation.
I can’t help, but I love that recycling thin clients is become more popular.
lemmy.basedcount.com and lemmy.dbzer0.com are both interesting.
It’s like people are taking the ideologies of the instance owners and labeling anyone in it to have the same ideologies. Where did this come from?
I generally agree, but hexbear exists mostly as a place where r/chapoTrapHouse users went after it got banned from reddit, so it tends to have a specific type of user. (not that I agree with de-federating them, despite not being exactly aligned with them politically)
Set your default view to subscribed in user options to show only the sublemmys you are subscribed to.
Even teletypes have firmware.
You can change it in user settings.
no DRM
Probably a dot matrix from the 90’s
Open source
Closest I’ve seen is open source plotters.
I guess I can understand how some may be concerned about the latter happening, but given mastodon is open source a hidden algorithm isn’t really possible (barring some esoteric technique like code obfuscation)
No idea why you’re getting downvoted when lemmy uses an algorithm by default.
Personally I stopped using printables after they allowed proprietary designs.
I have no idea what planar magnetic means, but it sounds impressive.
Isn’t gitlab one of those shitty “open” core projects?
netsplits/defederation.
You can’t just tell someone to register for any server, and they will be able to see everything. So they then have to choose a server, which takes effort, and can cause analysis paralysis.
So MI5 can get parties to drop candidates just by saying they “could” be a spy, without proof, or conviction?
Literally anyone “could” be a spy.
Doesn’t that mean the spooks can basically veto any candidate they don’t like?