I follow a YouTube channel, AI explained, that has some pretty grounded analysis of the latest models and capabilities. He compared LLMs to the creative writing center of the brain, as in they’re really nice to interact with, output things that sound correct, but ultimately are missing the capabilities of reasoning and factuality that are needed for AGI

• Hypervisor
• time daemon
• privilege escalation

That’s a yes then, because damaging (actually damaging, not just getting plexiglass wet) was one of their major tactics. It got to the point where museum owners considered denying entry to all women

https://www.npg.org.uk/whatson/firstworldwarcentenary/explore/gallery-stories/suffragette-action

8/10, relatiere stark, habe aber kein Kind

Do you condemn the suffragettes?

In Germany, protestors repeatedly shut oil pipelines off and locked themselves to the valves to prevent their reopening, blocking oil flow for several hours every time. I consume a lot of news, both mainstream and in my leftist bubble. That story barely registered anywhere.

The exact same protestors threw mashed potatoes at a Van Gogh. They were the main headline for over a week.

Hell, some guy set himself on fire a few years ago and it was in the news for half a day.

The media blackout is real, but it’s not a huge conspiracy. It’s just that the media reports on what gets them clicks, and nothing generates clicks like outrage. That’s why so much reporting also conveniently forgets to mention that the paintings are protected by plexiglass and nothing ever got damaged. But all the controversy gets people talking, and some people will inevitably question what drives people to do something like that. That is the real objective. If they wanted to be popular, they’d to greenwashed recycling videos on YouTube instead, or whatever else is hip with the neoliberal peddlers of personal responsibility at the moment.

If some soup on plexiglass can convince you to let the planet burn, you were never on the side of progress.

There was plexiglass in front of it. JSO has not permanently damaged anything, as far as I know. Quite the contrary, they take precautions to take care not to damage cultural artifacts. You know what doesn’t? Climate change.

For fucks sake, the suffragettes slashed paintings, and there’s more pearl clutching over some easily cleanable soup now than knives back then.

Great, you’re reducing your personal impact. That’s a great start. I’m sure our politicians will think of your hugle culture and recycling when they sign the next gas drilling licenses. We can’t ‘individual action’ our way out of this one.

And btw, I’m sure the activists do their recycling too.

Propose something better then. Or better yet, do it.

🤓☝️ Ähem, Frequenz ist Anzahl pro Zeit, ich habe in 12 Monaten 1.4k Kommentare abgesetzt, dein neuer Account in 3 Monaten 700. Ergo, deine Kommentarfrequenz ist das doppelte der meinen

To everyone in this thread who has nothing but insults for these activists, what are you doing against climate breakdown? Besides sitting on your couch, insulting people who are actually trying to make a difference, facing jail time?

You are the kind of people who would’ve called the Suffragettes names and said they’re hurting the cause, as well.

Ich korrigiere, anscheinend sammele sowie vergebe ich doch Punkte. 3/10

0/10, ich lurche nur

°ω°

Wrong on… pretty much all accounts

Cops, landlords, the entire advertising industry, anything to do with the stock exchange, PMCs, lobbyists (and by extension most career politicians)…

I’m just getting started

Hard agree on the data brokers, but what’s bad about bug bounty programs? I’d say it’s a good thing you get a reward if you help make a product more secure, and it helps discourage people from selling zero-days to black hats. Or do you mean black hat bug bounty systems? They are already super illegal

Which game is it?

Buy it yourself, get over 100, cash out