Holy shit. We’re back to this? Do you also think that the ghost of Kiev will lead the Ukranazis to victory?
Holy shit. We’re back to this? Do you also think that the ghost of Kiev will lead the Ukranazis to victory?
These libs are so used to having stopped caring about a war 8 years before it’s lost that they don’t even recognize what losing a war looks like. They think they can copium their way into Ukraine getting better terms.
He just banned his opposition from running in them. Certainly not the same thing.
I’m not sure if this was done on purpose, but you’ve just echoed the same criticisms that the western msm always directs at China. Each and every one of these examples is projection, whether or not you agree that China deserves the criticism.
I struggle to come up with any criticism that the west directs at China that isn’t projection. The entire subsidies narrative is completely absurd. When China invests less in an industry it’s “China’s state capitalism can’t keep up with the free market”. When China invests more it’s " China’s unfair state capitalism is disastrous to international markets".
All this suits the Chinese Communist Party well. Xi Jinping, China’s leader, has expressed the same ambition as the company, to overcome American sanctions with locally developed technology. The state, already Huawei’s biggest customer, also supports it in other ways. To spur the development of the semiconductor industry, it provides subsidies and invests alongside Huawei. The company and the government both own stakes in Focuslight, Everbright Photonics and Xuzhou B&C Chemical, for instance.
But Huawei’s relationship with the state is often misunderstood. The firm is not trying to indigenise its supply chain to comply with government directives. Rather, for Huawei and many other Chinese companies, self-sufficiency has become a commercial imperative because it is their only means of survival. Its investment decisions are market driven. This separates it from sluggish state-owned enterprises, which formulate their business plans based solely on state policy.
They don’t even bother to add paragraphs between their contradictions anymore.
Lmao. You’re going to need to provide a source for that one.
Final guess: 11ty?
The problem with liberal democracies isn’t that representatives are elected, its who those politicians represent. It’s not the working class, except when it is and those politicians get Salvador Allende’d 💀.
Can anyone guess what it is? My guess is SolidJS
Great explanation. Thank you!
I do not. You say that the CIA does however, so the analogy still works.
And that’s different from Amerikkka how?
Pot calling the kettle black. 🤷
I am neither a mister nor a Bolshevik.
I’ll take the L on this one. I shouldn’t have assumed your gender. I’m sorry.
The Bolshevik thing was sarcasm.
So the CIA calls him a dictator in one memo and not in another. I suppose that proves nothing in the end. Except that the CIA clearly doesn’t understand Soviet governance based on the other details in the memo that you linked.
Okay mister Bolshevik. What you write is contrary to everything that I’ve read about soviet governance, but I guess I’ll just have to take your word for it.
The collective west is currently taking part in an active genocide, out in the open for all to see. But gommunism bad holodomor vuvuzela no iPhone. We can’t upset the genocidal ruling class now, can we?
Youre welcome. The CIA agrees on the first point. https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP80-00810A006000360009-0.pdf
Uses both “tankie” and “lib” as an insult. Isn’t a fascist. Something’s not adding up.
It’s war. You can call it that. It doesn’t change any of the points in the comment that you’re replying to. Of course they won’t change your mind either because, youre just a racist troll.