He was big in a band called DC Talk which was christian rock/pop. They are that genre’s biggest act. This is big news for those people. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DC_Talk https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Tait

Could be a former cop who knows where keys are kept.

Could be someone who stole a cop car.

It’s because you cannot under normal circumstances engage in a killing spree but most can get laid if they have previously put in effort.

“Drug commercials as you know them really only began in 1997, when constraints were further loosened, and new meds began to feature in television commercials. For its part, the FDA notes that no federal law has ever outlawed drug ads, justifying its progressively lax regulation.”

The next paragraph explains why I mention the 1990sbecause before then you would have to have printed on screen the side effects.

Drug ads were only legalized in the 1990s. It was much better to not have to constantly see them.

You are correct

Iran was keeping to the treaty until we ripped it up.

Radio Free Asia, it is a US government news service.

Radio Free Europe/Asia are US government news sources. They are only sometimes credible.

As they should!

Our founding fathers fought back against their government. At the very least they would wonder why people aren’t gathering in mobs outside the homes and offices of legislators demanding change.

And? What about non-Zionist non-corporate sources that back the same narrative? Would you see that as any different?

I really want Apple to just stop redesigning things

Why do you need “Zionist corporate” in that post? Any media calling this a “preemptive strike” are pushing a bs narrative.

That’s a joke, right?

In 1992 I thought the GOP was being hyperbolic about Bill Clinton’s history of sexual predation. Im not proud of that.

I wouldn’t want this Iranian government to have nukes though

This isn’t like understanding a child’s game so I would say your baseball analogy is a false equivalence.

I’m not qualified enough to know what science is (ad hominem)

That isn’t ad hominem. Suggesting that the roots of your misunderstanding is due to your lack of experience or education in the field is not a personal attack. I am also not making an emotional appeal which is an alternate form of ad hominem.

Ad hominem would be if I suggested you couldn’t have an understanding because you are stupid (which I am absolutely in no way suggesting that you are unintelligent). I have not done this. I have suggested your lack of expertise in the field might be a good reason for you to question your own conclusions.

directing me to read an entire field of philosophy that for all I know has its entire existence bent towards proving that the social sciences are sciences exactly in the same way that natural sciences are

You dont need to become an expert but if you want to understand what we believe science is this is the place to start as the other place is a terminal degree in a science field which would be silly to suggest. The philosophy of science is the best field for you to get the answers to the uncertainty you have in your understanding

This is also not an example of ad hominem.

Why not read about the philosophy of science to expand your understanding? Why do you need to do it because I proved something to you?

Unless your rich, white, born into a family of haves, you’re life is bullseyed to the cops, military, and expendable.

Im most of these things but also gay so I’ll be in a camp before most especially after the Southern Baptist convention votes

Remember don’t all protest in one place. Multiple protests in a city are harder to control.