Youre going to short it?

You lost me at “no reason to rate a game badly”

My biggest gripe with minetest is the lack of support for large worlds. Honestly most of the times I won’t even touch the border, but there’s always a feeling of “end” when I’m playing minetest (or its forks/mods). As if playing it isn’t worth it.

I think the problem with our world is not the lack of children, but the lack of good parents.

It would be funny if no observable increase in new user happens

I did, but every time I made one, it lacked “soul”. So if I want to do some aabstract stuff, I’d rather use inkscape myself instead.

Tell me what you think afterwards!

It is an option, but for now, I want to prioritise Debian based OS first, as many people uses it.

For now the links is still on the horizon, I think its doable though, even with encryption. Tauri have been a good friend in the development phase, it does what it do fine. Sometimes I need to get my head around a performance spike though, just found out linux tauri (gtkwebkit i think) doesnt play well with shadows css. It slows the damn thing.

The docs are very thorough, for my usecase anyway.

treedome_0.5.4_amd64.deb is the linux build. For now I provide for debian, nix (new version on the way), and arch linux

How far up the ivory tower do you need to be to ignore homelessness by denying its existence?

Didn’t they contacted the owners mom about this? Fucking disgusting practices.

Really? There is a law already for this?

I think we need a very strict regulation, where the wording is never “purchase” or “buy” or “own”. It should always be “rent”. Because that’s what it is.

Youre right damn

Data information == metadata?

(2) a listing of all publicly available training data and where to obtain it; and (3) a listing of all training data obtainable from third parties and where to obtain it, including for fee.

imo this also includes “the data must be open”. The data used for training must be obtainable.

The description mentioned open source ai definition doesnt require data to be open. But https://opensource.org/ai/open-source-ai-definition explicitly require the data to be open?

Context please, and how will they pay the fine?

not even going to verify how accurate this is. Thanks

exactly