The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 3 天前He's an arboristlemmy.worldimagemessage-square127linkfedilinkarrow-up1640arrow-down16
arrow-up1634arrow-down1imageHe's an arboristlemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 3 天前message-square127linkfedilink
minus-squareundefinedValue@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down1·3 天前That’s not how it works with soft bodies though, method B represents potential useable length when pointing down. It’s only distorted because it’s pointing up. For rigid bodies, I’d agree.
minus-squarelightnsfw@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·2 天前Nobody cares how long the limp branches are.
minus-squareundefinedValue@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 天前Nobodies talking about the limp branches, soft and rigid bodies are a physics term and they don’t mean what you think they do.
minus-squarelightnsfw@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 天前It was a boner joke, I could not care less about what these words actually mean.
That’s not how it works with soft bodies though, method B represents potential useable length when pointing down. It’s only distorted because it’s pointing up. For rigid bodies, I’d agree.
Nobody cares how long the limp branches are.
Nobodies talking about the limp branches, soft and rigid bodies are a physics term and they don’t mean what you think they do.
It was a boner joke, I could not care less about what these words actually mean.
So… Non rigid?