But that still does not answer my question as to why that is “lame” (or in other words “loser”). So in this entire conversation and reply chain, you just wasted my time? If you don’t gonna answer the question, why do you keep these “lame” replies then? I just asked a simple question, didn’t I? And if it is relaly obvious and easy to see, how does it come you can’t explain it? Seems like a paradox to me.
It’s Gabe Follower…
I know and your reply still does not answer my question.
The answer is plain to those with the eyes to see it… Or something.
I don’t get it. What’s wrong with it? If it is that clear, could you explain it to me?
There’s nothing to explain. I guess the idea of someone who just follows Gabe Newell is funny and could be interpreted as lame. It’s not that deep.
But that still does not answer my question as to why that is “lame” (or in other words “loser”). So in this entire conversation and reply chain, you just wasted my time? If you don’t gonna answer the question, why do you keep these “lame” replies then? I just asked a simple question, didn’t I? And if it is relaly obvious and easy to see, how does it come you can’t explain it? Seems like a paradox to me.
Christ… You should learn to disengage.
You should also learn to disengage if you have no answer and nothing to add to the discussion.
deleted by creator
But I’m having fun.
why would you be a follower of a billionaire?.. that’s the lame part.
For news? Is this a joke or what is this?
sure buddy