Says exec of company that has objectively caused more environmental harm to the world than any others

  • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    Petrochemicals and the energy from fossil fuels did provide the needed food and energy to boost our standard of living.

    HOWEVER

    By the time we knew they were affecting the climate, we had the technology to move off of them and didn’t because of assholes like this.

    • Greyghoster@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      The sad part is that he may be right because the urgency to transition off fossils is lost in our desire not to be inconvenienced. Don’t mention the bribes (some call them donations) to political parties, candidates and Supreme Court judges.

    • bioemerl@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      we had the technology to move off of them

      We still don’t have the technology to move of them. Energy storage is severely lacking.

        • bioemerl@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s possible, but it’s not like technology halted in that time and there has been a big energy independence drive regardless of Reagan.

          The harsh truth is that we still need fossil fuels today.

          We’re probably going to need them for decades to come, even if we have massive green energy drives.

          • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            big energy independence drive

            This is a great weasel word. “Energy independence.” Like we’re going to hook cables up to George Washington and run on carbon-neutral Freedom Juice.™

            “Energy independence” still means using fossil fuels. Just maybe different ones like natural gas instead of coal. There’s less emissions, sure, but it’s not anything like what Carter envisioned: Solar power stations in LEO, beaming gigawatts of carbon neutral power down from space.

  • Murais@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    You’re selling Earth blood that makes the sky melt.

    That’s pretty fucking evil.

  • jaspersgroove@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    “We’re not selling an evil product, we’re just running a multibillion dollar cartel in an evil way. That’s totally different.”

  • Jax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Plastic in the oceans, Co2 and heavy metals in the air, war, and above all: Wednesday morning traffic (worst day where I am due to WFH rules still being decently widespread).

    Looks like someone needs a bullet.

    • Guru_Insights99@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Hello users of Lemmy 👋 I’m a Brand Ambassador of Chevron corporate and would like to clear up this misunderstanding about our brand. Chevron provides oil, diesel and hot gas to millions of people worldwide. Although our brand has had setbacks, the utility we bring to millions of users every day has been overwhelmingly positive.

      I hope this clears up any tensions and we hope to continue providing quality products to our clients in the future. Cheers