Says exec of company that has objectively caused more environmental harm to the world than any others

  • bioemerl@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    we had the technology to move off of them

    We still don’t have the technology to move of them. Energy storage is severely lacking.

      • bioemerl@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s possible, but it’s not like technology halted in that time and there has been a big energy independence drive regardless of Reagan.

        The harsh truth is that we still need fossil fuels today.

        We’re probably going to need them for decades to come, even if we have massive green energy drives.

        • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          big energy independence drive

          This is a great weasel word. “Energy independence.” Like we’re going to hook cables up to George Washington and run on carbon-neutral Freedom Juice.™

          “Energy independence” still means using fossil fuels. Just maybe different ones like natural gas instead of coal. There’s less emissions, sure, but it’s not anything like what Carter envisioned: Solar power stations in LEO, beaming gigawatts of carbon neutral power down from space.