TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · il y a 18 joursno rule infuriates me morelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square272linkfedilinkarrow-up11.22Karrow-down117
arrow-up11.2Karrow-down1imageno rule infuriates me morelemmy.blahaj.zoneTotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · il y a 18 joursmessage-square272linkfedilink
minus-squareG4Z@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·il y a 17 joursWhat I tend to do, rather than copying the output I just check out the sources it used and then I link those when I’m arguing a point.
minus-squareToga77@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·il y a 17 joursExcept that LLMs often cite completely irrelevant crap or make up citations.
minus-squarePasserby6497@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·il y a 17 joursI wonder if that’s why they check the sources before using them for their argument 🤔
minus-squareToga77@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·il y a 17 joursIt’s incredibly easy to go to a “cited” a link, read a title, and assume the content. No one on the internet right now is actually taking the time to read sources like this guy and if you believe they are I have a bridge to sell you.
minus-squarePasserby6497@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·il y a 16 joursWeird, didn’t realize my name was “no one”. Either that, or I’m not really on the Internet right now.
minus-squareG4Z@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·il y a 14 joursYeah dude, you have to read what’s on the page. Old school I know, but I am old so it’s just what I’ve always done except the LLM found it faster. I do prefer to make arguments without any LLM use, but if I do, I don’t post what it says just the links.
minus-squareTheparishofChigwell@sh.itjust.worksBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·il y a 17 joursRemoved by mod
minus-squareironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·il y a 17 joursSure! Here’s an article from ‘pogromist weekly’ and a scholarly piece published in the journal 1488!
minus-squareTheparishofChigwell@sh.itjust.worksBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·il y a 17 joursRemoved by mod
minus-squareHomosexual sapiens@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·il y a 16 jours1488 in this context is not a year, it’s a reference to the fourteen words
minus-squareTheparishofChigwell@sh.itjust.worksBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·il y a 16 joursRemoved by mod
minus-squareironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·il y a 16 joursThe whole political spectrum, from the secular pogromist to the fanatical neo-odinist!
What I tend to do, rather than copying the output I just check out the sources it used and then I link those when I’m arguing a point.
Except that LLMs often cite completely irrelevant crap or make up citations.
I wonder if that’s why they check the sources before using them for their argument 🤔
It’s incredibly easy to go to a “cited” a link, read a title, and assume the content.
No one on the internet right now is actually taking the time to read sources like this guy and if you believe they are I have a bridge to sell you.
Weird, didn’t realize my name was “no one”. Either that, or I’m not really on the Internet right now.
Yeah dude, you have to read what’s on the page.
Old school I know, but I am old so it’s just what I’ve always done except the LLM found it faster.
I do prefer to make arguments without any LLM use, but if I do, I don’t post what it says just the links.
Removed by mod
Sure! Here’s an article from ‘pogromist weekly’ and a scholarly piece published in the journal 1488!
Removed by mod
1488 in this context is not a year, it’s a reference to the fourteen words
Removed by mod
The whole political spectrum, from the secular pogromist to the fanatical neo-odinist!