After reversing its position on remote work, Dell is reportedly implementing new tracking techniques on May 13 to ensure its workers are following the company’s return-to-office (RTO) policy, The Register reported today, citing anonymous sources.

Dell will track employees’ badge swipes and VPN connections to confirm that workers are in the office for a significant amount of time.

Dell’s methods for tracking hybrid workers will also reportedly include a color-coding system. From “consistent” to “limited” presence, the colors are blue, green, yellow, and red.

The Register reported today that approximately 50 percent of Dell’s US workers are remote, compared to 66 percent of international workers.

An examination of 457 companies on the S&P 500 list released in February concluded that RTO mandates don’t drive company value but instead negatively affect worker morale. Analysis of survey data from more than 18,000 working Americans released in March found that flexible workplace policies, including the ability to work remotely completely or part-time and flexible schedules, can help employees’ mental health.

  • 0x0@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    6 months ago

    The only marginally logical excuse i’ve heard for RTO is to justify rented office space.

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      6 months ago

      Remote work is not right for ALL companies. Just ones that are completely or predominantly software-based.

      Breakfast cereal manufacturing - hey. Someone’s gotta be there to close up all the boxes.

      I forget - does Dell make breakfast cereal?

      • MakePorkGreatAgain@lemmy.basedcount.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 months ago

        remote work is pretty prevalent in finance/banking - at my job only the customer facing folks (branch offices, investment/mortgage, etc) need to actually be in the office - that’s only 30% of the workforce. another 15% is hybrid now, the rest are 100% remote.

    • isles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      6 months ago

      Love it when the logical excuse is the Sunk Cost Fallacy.

      Though I think there’s some truth - companies still pay employees for their WFH rigs / utilities (or they should be, anyway), so it’s not exactly free for them to have WFH (just a lot cheaper, if there’s a choice).

      The logical excuse I buy into is that commercial real estate is valued on it’s income and if business aren’t renewing leases because they don’t need office space, then commercial real estate values tank. That and thinly veiled layoffs.

      • macrocephalic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 months ago

        Which companies pay for WFH expenses? I worked for the biggest software company in the world in 2022 and there was no WFH allowance. We were 100% WFH at that point.

        • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yeah we are all WFH and we asked for a small stipend that was denied.

          I expended a double wide gaming monitor anyway. Boss didn’t care.

        • png@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          In many countries they have to pay for ergonomically suitable WFH equipment if they mandate WFH

    • gmtom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      6 months ago

      A large portion of most rich peoples investment portfolios is commercial real estate.

      So if remote work takes off then offices devalue and their invest profiles diminish. That’s why all the big business have colluded to force RTO, even if it would ostensibly cost their business more to do so. The execs personal savings are more important.

      • thisisnotgoingwell@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        This, and it’s a way to make sure urban economies with investments stay stimulated… If the companies said “okay, just do your job, IDC” then a lot of people would move to rural areas. Also, corporate office leases are usually long, like 15 years. If the companies stop paying their leases, the entire flimsy financial system would crumble, since modern economics/property prices are more about potential/theoretical value rather than real value. You need a big fancy building in a fancy city to attract top talent, high earners, so it keeps the class system intact as well.

        • 0x0@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          You need a big fancy building in a fancy city to attract top talent,

          WFH attracts me, not fancy buildings in cities… YMMV i guess.

    • Rolivers@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      That’s how it is in the company I work for. They aren’t strict about it though, we are supposed to be in office 3/5 days but some people barely make 1/5 . As far as I know nobody cares as there is no tracking system yet.