• EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Session is also sus because you effectively cannot host a node, last I have seen. They claim it is “against a Sybil attack” but all it does is making sure only people wih large disposable funds can have nodes, and the effect might be the exact opposite.

      Simplex is more interesting in this regard because while I am concerned with initial centralization (the default servers), they made hosting your own easy. But I personally stick with imperfect yet trusty XMPP.

      • Brayd@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        SimpleX is great. BUT it’s not user friendly. Thus general adoption for the average user will be hard. Don’t get me wrong using the app itself is easy but as soon as someone switches their phone that doesn’t have technical knowledge they will loose their chats because they won’t understand the concept of moving their DB. Since you don’t have an identifier like a phone number with SimpleX those people could even lose contacts as a whole since they generate a new DB, hurting their social connections.

        That’s the reason I personally never recommend SimpleX to anyone who doesn’t have the technical knowledge to understand stuff like that.

    • refalo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      It has had some suspicious funding sources

      Wait until you find out where computers, the Internet, GPS, weather satellites and Tor came from.

    • Autonomous User@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      suspicious funding

      Which lines of its libre software source code are malicious?

      requires your phone number

      It’s centralised

    • Breve@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      Telegram requires a phone number too? I mean yeah there’s the option to use that blockchain phone number service, but you can do the same for Signal. 🤷

    • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago
      • It requires your phone number

      Not anymore, right? Or does it still need your number for signing up?

    • Numberone@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Signal no longer requires a phone number. You can now create an account. Not sure if that helps your outlook on it, but yeah. It was a fairly recent update that this was rolled out.

      Edit: being told we still do need numbers to register. I haven’t gotten a new phone since well before the change was made, so I haven’t actually created an account and gone through the process. It looks like I misinterpreted what was going on when I read the changelog.

      • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        Last I have seen, it still requires a number to register - it just doesn’t have to be public.

        What gets me the most is the requirement of a smartphone to register. No way I am trusting my non-public chats to a phone, so that means either Waydroid/VM (which creates issues with copypasting) or signal-cli (which is fairly inconvenient).