• DarkenLM@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly, given the context of a browser, Javascript’s “Everything is better than crashing” philosophy does not seem too out-of-place. Yes, the website might break, but at least it would be theoretically usable still.

    Yes, a statically typed language would help, but I’d rather not have one that is “these two types are slightly different, fuck you, have a segfault”, but rather one that is slightly more flexible.

    • CanadaPlus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Actually, that’s a good point, in scripting fatal type errors can happen at runtime. I guess Python is the right choice then, given it’s maturity and popularity, and then you can code the complex stuff in whatever you want via WASM like other people mentioned.

      • stifle867@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s interesting to think how this would have changed some of the things we take for granted today. For example, for production we “minify” our CSS and JS, but Python has enforced whitespace. Would we still have come up with minifying and those on restricted data just take the hit?