After all, the privacy of our mind may be the only privacy we have left.

  • ForgottenFlux@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 months ago

    Summary:

    • Colorado passes first-in-nation law to protect privacy of biological or brain data, which is similar to fingerprints if used to identify people.
    • Advances in artificial intelligence have led to medical breakthroughs, including devices that can read minds and alter brains.
    • Neurotechnology devices, such as Emotiv and Somnee, are used for health care and can move computers with thoughts or improve brain function and identify impairments.
    • Most of these devices are not regulated by the FDA and are marketed for wellness.
    • With benefits come risks, such as insurance companies discriminating, law enforcement interrogating, and advertisers manipulating brain data.
    • Medical research facilities are subject to privacy laws, but private companies amassing large caches of brain data are not.
    • The Neurorights Foundation found that two-thirds of these companies are already sharing or selling data with third parties.
    • The new law takes effect on Aug. 8, but it is unclear which companies are subject to it and how it will be enforced.
    • Pauzauskie and the Neurorights Foundation are pushing for a federal law and even a global accord to prevent brain data from being used without consent.
  • solrize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 months ago

    Ticking time bomb! Think of the children!!! Law or no law, this will be abused if it can be. Having the law is still a good thing I guess.

  • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    Next up in the dystopian cyberpunk pipeline: in-brain data encryption technology with a programmed tamper killswitch. Like that shit in the movie “Elysium”.

    Aren’t you guys loving this ride so far?

  • umami_wasabi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Will this law protecting self incriminating myself if feds use it to gather evidences?

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      You’re actually already protected.

      For example a polygraph can only be used with consent.

      • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Polygraphs are also complete pseudoscience. The guy running the test can make it spit out whatever results he wants.

  • Gutless2615@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    If it could identify you or be used for identification purposes it will fall into at least CAs personal information/biometric information definition I believe…