- cross-posted to:
- privacy@lemmy.ml
- cross-posted to:
- privacy@lemmy.ml
You must log in or register to comment.
Yeah, that’s the main problem with matrix. Not that all clients are dumpster fire UX built to scare off normies.
cinny has nice ux imo
Somehow this article is full of “We didn’t read it but trust us …”
Literally all their issues were addressed by the very document they claimed wasn’t worth reading yet they linked to anyway… That was in 2019. So they solved this persons complaints five years ago.
https://www.matrix.org/blog/2019/09/27/privacy-improvements-in-synapse-1-4-and-riot-1-4/
Read the research paper on Matrix’ privacy then, and make your own judgements.
Too old (it’s from 2019) and too tendetious in tone; didn’t read. For both reasons it seems certain that it does not tell the whole story.
Site is down right now but I imagine it is yet another contribution in the genre of leaping to the worst possible conclusions about matrix from very shaky ground. I don’t know what motivates that sort of thing, but there sure seems to be a lot of it around.
There is zero requirement to use any server or service associated with either New Vector or the Matrix Foundation.
There is also zero requirement to use the server (synapse, dendrite) or client (Element) implementations developed by these guys.
For example, I use conduwuit for my home server, with neochat and fluffychat clients, and they talk using published APIs and nothing else…
Matrix is just in its baby stages and will get better. Something this complicated takes a while to develop.
No, Matrix is just a privacy disaster that is run by a for profit company.
Is there a way to know if a Matrix server is using synapse or dendrite, as a user? Because unless you’re only communicating with self-hosted instances, that creates a problem.
The issues claimed about Synapse here were literally addressed over four years ago.
