Hello World, As many of you have probably noticed, there is a growing problem on the internet when it comes to undisclosed bias in both amateur and professional reporting. While not every outlet can be like the C-SPAN, or Reuters, we also believe that it’s impossible to remove the human element from the news, especially when it concerns, well, humans.

To this end, we’ve created a media bias bot, which we hope will keep everyone informed about WHO, not just the WHAT of posted articles. This bot uses Media Bias/Fact Check to add a simple reply to show bias. We feel this is especially important with the US Election coming up. The bot will also provide links to Ground.News, as well, which we feel is a great source to determine the WHOLE coverage of a given article and/or topic.

As always feedback is welcome, as this is a active project which we really hope will benefit the community.

Thanks!

FHF / LemmyWorld Admin team 💖

  • sandbox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Given the overwhelmingly negative response from the community, what is the justification for leaving the bot in place? Is it because the moderators think they know better than everyone else?

    • Rooki@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Overwhelmingly negative? Those are the 24/7 negative users. We do anything: Those guys: THIS IS IS A THREAT TO DEMOCRACY

      So you stand alone in that statement. See the post vote score.

      We give you the option to block it. Block it.

      • Vespair@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Got it, only enthusiastic yes men are actually counted as valid members of the community.

        Interesting take, gotta admit.

      • sandbox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Numerous comments contain thoughtfully researched, balanced and reasonable criticisms, and your reaction is to basically call them just a bunch of negative nellies, rather than to consider maybe whether they have a point.

        If I made a bot that shared fake news in comments on every single news story, would you say that having the option to block that bot is sufficient? I can block anyone, yet you still ban people for breaking the rules here.

        You’re getting way too defensive, and digging your heels in - criticism isn’t always bad faith.

        • Rooki@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          They have a point but strict fake news it isnt. It is not an option to leave it without any second bias opinion. Its not banning anyone. If you dislike it and demand it to be shutdown for democracy. Then you arent allowing other opinions.

    • zephyreks@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Well, it’s more that the mods know that people don’t have an alternative