• affiliate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    after reading this article, it makes a lot of sense that joe rogan said RFK jr was the “only candidate that makes sense”

    “Somebody will send me something and I’ll go ‘Holy cow, did you see this?’,” he said, describing how he credulously forwards fake content to his children, only for them to have to correct him. (Kennedy said that, unlike him, his children can identify fake images “immediately.”)

    this reads exactly like something joe rogan would do

    • EnderMB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Joe Rogan just wants funny shit to happen. He doesn’t give a shit about how the country is run. The only reason he’s not picking Trump now is because it’s less funny now than it was when he beat Hillary.

    • SeaJ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      That just screams boomer to me. It reminds me that growing up, my parents told me to not believe everything I read on the internet. If only they would take their own advice…

  • Eiri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Honestly, generally speaking he’s an idiot, but in this specific instance I like that he’s admitting to his fault.

    We all fall for misinformation at least sometimes. It’s time to stop shaming people for falling for it and doing something about the issue.

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      The problem with him is that he then pushes that misinformation without vetting it first.

    • Daxtron2@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      He’s not the alternative he’s the result. If legitimate 3rd party candidates had a real shot he would’ve never gotten this far.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I suppose, but every time there’s been a third party candidate that has gained any traction, he’s been terrible. Ross Perot, Pat Buchanan, Ralph Nader… even Donald Trump himself made a third party attempt in 2000 and got a lot further than he should have.

        And then there’s the Libertarians.

    • CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s because the two-party system is a systemic problem. Our winner-take-all voting system always punishes similar candidates, so if similar groups don’t form a coalition and choose a single candidate to run for them, they will cannibalize each other and surely lose. So, you inevitably end up with two parties each representing all the factions on one side of the spectrum.

      As a result, anybody on the national level who decides to run as a third party candidate (a) doesn’t understand our voting system, (b) is just doing it for the publicity, or © is out of their mind.

      If we had a different voting system that did not punish similar candidates (like ranked choice), not only would quality third parties be possible, they would be inevitable.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    RFK is just like your idiot uncle. Big uncle energy. Except weirder and without the necessary consequences. Taking weird photos with dead animals.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Speaking as a quirky uncle….

      Yeah. I kinda hate you at the moment. The weird phots we take are like, forced perspective things that are fun.

      Giant sunfish is on a stringer is a classic

      These? Creepy.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      If someone sends you something that says we landed on Mars and made contact with other life forms, a respectable person researches it before passing that information along as possibly real… Not send it to people and say “holy cow have you seen this” and then have them respond telling you youve fallen for crazy junk again.

      It shows that he incapable of taking care of himself and requires a caretaker.

      It’s fine to make a mistake, or fall for something, it happens. It should be rare though, especially if you are running to be responsible for the lives of hundreds of millions of people directly, and billions indirectly.