The only alternatives mentioned were Threads and Bluesky.

  • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yeah, but then again, do you want a government controlled social media? 🤔

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s not… it’s the fediverse. I’m completely fine with them having their own instance, it’s not like they control it by any means. Hell they can be defederated. It’s a lot better than them choosing some random instance.

    • veee@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      The government could control social media on their own instance, sure.

      I think having government accounts come from an official instance would garner more trust in the platform.

    • a lil bee 🐝@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think the distributed nature of Mastodon keeps government control from being an issue. It would be kind of cool as a space for citizens to ask for assistance or air grievances while giving the politicians an officially owned space for things like announcements.

      • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Totally agree. The issues with “government-controlled social media” are a non-issue in a federated environment, and the URL would give them legitimacy.

    • Flamekebab@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t want a private company controlling government email servers, why would I want them to control government social media platforms?