The only alternatives mentioned were Threads and Bluesky.

  • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 个月前

    Yeah, but then again, do you want a government controlled social media? 🤔

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 个月前

      It’s not… it’s the fediverse. I’m completely fine with them having their own instance, it’s not like they control it by any means. Hell they can be defederated. It’s a lot better than them choosing some random instance.

    • veee@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 个月前

      The government could control social media on their own instance, sure.

      I think having government accounts come from an official instance would garner more trust in the platform.

    • a lil bee 🐝@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 个月前

      I think the distributed nature of Mastodon keeps government control from being an issue. It would be kind of cool as a space for citizens to ask for assistance or air grievances while giving the politicians an officially owned space for things like announcements.

      • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 个月前

        Totally agree. The issues with “government-controlled social media” are a non-issue in a federated environment, and the URL would give them legitimacy.

    • Flamekebab@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 个月前

      I don’t want a private company controlling government email servers, why would I want them to control government social media platforms?