• mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Poor soul thinks said corporate media somehow exists completely outside of the scope of the DNC as if the DNC itself isn’t just a convention for corporate donors to show up and throw in their demands in exchange for campaign funds and lobbying money.

    I mean I’m sure the headline NYT article about Clinton having a 91% chance of winning was totally some next level corporate funded psyop and not a one of the many thousands of advertisements paid for by the DNC. /s

    No, it’s totally the corporate media that’s after her and has absolutely nothing to do with the candidate that dropped the entire uncommitted movement worth of constituents for $100 mil in corporate AIPAC money. /s

        • Restaldt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Mostly the anger at having to pick a slightly less lethal poison election after election

          The DNC went full mask off this year by not holding primaries. By campaining with the cheneys and pushing 10 year old GOP policies/talking points.

          All they will learn from this is losing elections still lets you amass a “warchest” of one billion dollars

          • capital@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            lol. Slightly.

            I’ll remember this thread when abortions are banned nationwide.

          • aesthelete@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            10 hours ago

            The last president – Obama – that the DNC really wasn’t at all involved with was still somehow not very progressive.