Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky has said the death of Yevgeny Prigozhin – the Russian mercenary leader whose plane crashed weeks after he led a mutiny against Moscow’s military leadership – shows what happens when people make deals with Russian leader Vladimir Putin.

As Ukraine’s counteroffensive moves into a fourth month, with only modest gains to show so far, Zelensky told CNN’s Fareed Zakaria he rejected suggestions it was time to negotiate peace with the Kremlin.

“When you want to have a compromise or a dialogue with somebody, you cannot do it with a liar,” Volodymyr Zelensky said.

      • Cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        And? Should we not point hypocricy and double standards because it hurts your feelings?

        • Veraticus@lib.lgbt
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          This isn’t hypocrisy or a double standard. Your argument is unironically “because America did bad things we must let bad things happen everywhere.”

          No one here is saying America smells like roses. Does that mean we can’t try to do good? Must we stand idle and let Ukrainians die when we could help them?

          • kd637_mi@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            No, it’s pointing out a precedent set by the USA and allies that wholesale slaughter of innocents is acceptable to the international community. Russia’s invasion, whether legitimate or not, is no more spurious in its reasons than so many of the USA’s ones over the last how ever many decades.

            That doesn’t make this one right, it just points out that the “rules based order” is a falsehood. Otherwise every US president in recent to not so recent history would also have an arrest warrant out for them, and the US would be sanctioned into the ground.

            I generally have a hard time believing the US intends to do good outside of padding the pockets of corporate lobbyists and politicians. I’m not a fan of the whole “until the last Ukrainian” war that’s happening either.

            • Veraticus@lib.lgbt
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              This seems totally unrelated to my point.

              Even if this is true, we can still try to do the right thing. And we should try.

              • kd637_mi@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                You said the other commenter’s point seemed to be ‘because America did bad things we must let bad things happen’. That wasn’t their point, at least not to my reading of it. I read it as trying to highlight the hypocrisy of the international community, which usually means the USA and associated countries.

                None of this is to excuse the war in Ukraine, but if the international community is to mean anything, and to have any legitimacy, it needs to apply the rules across the board. Since it doesn’t mean anything beyond what is good for the US/corporate interests, the rules have not, and will not be applied evenly.

                The US is not trying to do the right thing, it is trying to advance it’s interests in the region at the expense of Russia, and unfortunately for Ukrainians at the expense of them too, even if it benefits Ukraine as a state. The fact that the US can wage so many destructive wars that are later acknowledged as mistakes and still be seen as trying to do the right thing shows how effective the propaganda arm of the country is.

                • Veraticus@lib.lgbt
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  But who cares if the US is trying to advance its interests in the region? Again, Russia is waging an unjust war of territorial aggression against Ukraine. That’s wrong and immoral on the face of it and should be resisted. If the US is willing to intervene, I honestly don’t care if they achieve strategic objectives on the side. I am interested in opposing imperialism, which, in this case, the US is doing.

                  • kd637_mi@lemmy.sdf.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Ok, fair enough. But the achieving strategic objectives isn’t on the side, it’s the primary aim. People can see that and still support the US supporting Ukraine, but it seems so many people just think that the US are ‘the good guys’. They aren’t. No one is. The Ukrainian government aren’t the good guys, stopping people from leaving the country and forcing them to fight, and honouring Bandera and Azov. The Russian government aren’t the good guys, conscripting their own citizens to fight people they say are their brothers, and their denazifying rhetoric might have had some pull if they didn’t trade back those very Nazis after Azovstahl. The US government and the collective west aren’t the good guys, supplying just enough weaponry to keep Ukraine in the fight, then upping support when it looks bad.

                    Also, going back to my talk about precedents set by the USA, this sets a precedent for other countries to overtly arm, fund, train, and supply intelligence to their direct opponents in any if their future aggressive wars. If the counterargument to that is, ‘well, they can try, but we will fuck them up,’ then we are in might makes right territory, which is more or less how the US currently operates, but clearly not ideal.

    • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Most of those actual deaths were Muslims killing Muslims. Deaths caused by United States soldiers are comparatively low.

      For example, the Iraqi body count website tracks 210,000 civilians killed between 2003 and 2020.

      According to your article, it cites US-led wars in countries such as Pakistan, Libya, Yemen and Syria. However, the United States did not launch a war in any of those countries and certainly did not fight a war in Pakistan which is a US ally.

      The Washington Post article as well as research from Brown University has Lucy affiliated anyone who has died outside of the expected peacetime death rate in any country in Africa in the Middle East to be attributable to the United States which is, frankly completely unfair. ISIL aka the Islamic State for instance killed tens of thousands of people, yet those deaths are attributed to the United States. Which is completely crazy!

      While I was completely against the 2003 Iraq war, and even March and protest against it, the truth of the matter is that Saddam was a complete bastard, the bath is party were fascist, and destroying them created enormous power vacuum which resulted in chaos death and destruction. However, this was probably an inevitability Saddam wasn’t going to last forever and had no system of governance to transfer leadership to someone else. The Middle East has been well known for centuries as a chaotic and violent region of the world and Sunni and Shiite Muslims have been at war with each other since time immemorial.

      • MeowZedong@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe take a good look at that last paragraph you wrote and think about why you blame the conflicts in the middle east on a reductive basis of “they are savages” rather than looking at the actual historical context of what has caused instability in the region.

        Seriously, this entire comment is just a racist write-off of the middle east that is completely devoid of any true consideration of history. Ignorance personified.