SorosFootSoldier [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 5 months agoMedia is highlighting two stories about immigrants killing people, so I wanted to remind everyone you're more likely to be killed by an acquaintance than a stranger.www.statista.comexternal-linkmessage-square29linkfedilinkarrow-up1105arrow-down10
arrow-up1105arrow-down1external-linkMedia is highlighting two stories about immigrants killing people, so I wanted to remind everyone you're more likely to be killed by an acquaintance than a stranger.www.statista.comSorosFootSoldier [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square29linkfedilink
minus-squareDirt_Owl [comrade/them, they/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·5 months agoOhhhh you’re right. I was reading it wrong. Damn I’m not bright haha
minus-squareFrivolous_Beatnik [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·edit-25 months agoWell you say that, but your name is Dirt_Owl not Dumb_Owl so jot that down. To quote the chart 12 people were murdered by their employer 3,527 people were killed by an acquaintance compared to 1,674 who were killed by a stranger. so the bar titles denote the killer not the victim. I’m confused
minus-squareDirt_Owl [comrade/them, they/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·5 months agoSee this is why I hate graphs.
minus-squaresooper_dooper_roofer [none/use name]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·5 months ago 12 people were murdered by their employer 12 employers were murdered by their employees
minus-squareFrivolous_Beatnik [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·5 months agoThat would make sense, but that’s what it says verbatim
minus-squaresooper_dooper_roofer [none/use name]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 months ago relationship of victim to offender yes, which means the victim is (employer of) offender. the offender killed their employer.
minus-squareFrivolous_Beatnik [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·5 months agoWhich makes sense, yes. I’m saying, since the start of the thread, that the chart title, the bar labels, and the text on the statista page are conflicting with each other which makes the whole thing look unprofessional.
minus-squaresooper_dooper_roofer [none/use name]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-25 months agook nvm I see what you mean. the bottom text is wrong and should be reversed.
minus-squarepropter_hog [mirror/your pronouns]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·5 months agoI did the exact same thing, and my bullshit meter went off the charts
Ohhhh you’re right. I was reading it wrong. Damn I’m not bright haha
Well you say that, but your name is Dirt_Owl not Dumb_Owl so jot that down. To quote the chart
so the bar titles denote the killer not the victim. I’m confused
See this is why I hate graphs.
12 employers were murdered by their employees
That would make sense, but that’s what it says verbatim
yes, which means the victim is (employer of) offender. the offender killed their employer.
Which makes sense, yes. I’m saying, since the start of the thread, that the chart title, the bar labels, and the text on the statista page are conflicting with each other which makes the whole thing look unprofessional.
ok nvm I see what you mean. the bottom text is wrong and should be reversed.
I did the exact same thing, and my bullshit meter went off the charts