SorosFootSoldier [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 19 days agoMedia is highlighting two stories about immigrants killing people, so I wanted to remind everyone you're more likely to be killed by an acquaintance than a stranger.www.statista.comexternal-linkmessage-square29fedilinkarrow-up1105arrow-down10
arrow-up1105arrow-down1external-linkMedia is highlighting two stories about immigrants killing people, so I wanted to remind everyone you're more likely to be killed by an acquaintance than a stranger.www.statista.comSorosFootSoldier [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 19 days agomessage-square29fedilink
minus-squareDirt_Owl [comrade/them, they/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·19 days agoOhhhh you’re right. I was reading it wrong. Damn I’m not bright haha
minus-squareFrivolous_Beatnik [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·edit-218 days agoWell you say that, but your name is Dirt_Owl not Dumb_Owl so jot that down. To quote the chart 12 people were murdered by their employer 3,527 people were killed by an acquaintance compared to 1,674 who were killed by a stranger. so the bar titles denote the killer not the victim. I’m confused
minus-squareDirt_Owl [comrade/them, they/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·19 days agoSee this is why I hate graphs.
minus-squaresooper_dooper_roofer [none/use name]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·19 days ago 12 people were murdered by their employer 12 employers were murdered by their employees
minus-squareFrivolous_Beatnik [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·19 days agoThat would make sense, but that’s what it says verbatim
minus-squaresooper_dooper_roofer [none/use name]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·19 days ago relationship of victim to offender yes, which means the victim is (employer of) offender. the offender killed their employer.
minus-squareFrivolous_Beatnik [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·19 days agoWhich makes sense, yes. I’m saying, since the start of the thread, that the chart title, the bar labels, and the text on the statista page are conflicting with each other which makes the whole thing look unprofessional.
minus-squaresooper_dooper_roofer [none/use name]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-219 days agook nvm I see what you mean. the bottom text is wrong and should be reversed.
minus-squarepropter_hog [any, any]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·19 days agoI did the exact same thing, and my bullshit meter went off the charts
Ohhhh you’re right. I was reading it wrong. Damn I’m not bright haha
Well you say that, but your name is Dirt_Owl not Dumb_Owl so jot that down. To quote the chart
so the bar titles denote the killer not the victim. I’m confused
See this is why I hate graphs.
12 employers were murdered by their employees
That would make sense, but that’s what it says verbatim
yes, which means the victim is (employer of) offender. the offender killed their employer.
Which makes sense, yes. I’m saying, since the start of the thread, that the chart title, the bar labels, and the text on the statista page are conflicting with each other which makes the whole thing look unprofessional.
ok nvm I see what you mean. the bottom text is wrong and should be reversed.
I did the exact same thing, and my bullshit meter went off the charts