• drinkinglakewater [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Some gripes:

    • Mao should not be listed under “Socialism with Chinese Characteristics”, this was a post-Mao invention and Mao’s work contributes directly to Marxism-Leninism
    • Gaddafi should be removed entirely. He may be valuable as a historical figure but he is not a socialist theorist (iirc the Green Book is explicitly non-Marxist) and including him under “Socialism” is misleading to new and less informed communists
    • Why share the works of the revisionist CPRF? Here is an exert from ProleWiki’s own article on them “Zyuganov and the [CPRF] support social conservatism
  • Yuritopiaposadism [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Statesian anarchist Murray Bookchin derisively remarked that he does not care about the “poor little children who were fed under communism.”

    I am tired of this shit, unless this can be corroborated, this is slander. I know Parenti and Bookchin didnt get along but I am tired of this quote being thrown around like evidence.

    • Changeling [it/its]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      This is the full quote, according to Parenti:

      Left anticommunists remained studiously unimpressed by the dramatic gains won by masses of previously impoverished people under communism. Some were even scornful of such accomplishments. I recall how in Burlington Vermont, in 1971, the noted anticommunist anarchist, Murray Bookchin, derisively referred to my concern for “the poor little children who got fed under communism” (his words).

      It’s literally a personal anecdote claimed by Parenti, so I don’t see that being corroborated.