• haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 days ago

    I really like that she casually uses the term robber baron for billionaires. First person I hear to do that consistently.

    Sidenote: I wish she would not repeat herself so many times. The video could have been a lot shorter.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yeah a 50 minute video is off the table for me unless it were a polished video made by someone I know makes good shit. Video essays don’t qualify for me in that way

  • perestroika@slrpnk.netM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    “Why do we ask billionaires about the state of physics” - interesting question.

    I propose an answer: it’s not “we” asking, it’s the media.

    • billionaires are famous
    • the media loves to interview famous people (about anything they’ll say)
    • rich people invest in technology and fund various research & development efforts, some related to physics
    • eventually the media and rich people will talk physics, giving their opinions a wide platform

    There also seems to be a cognitive bias involved: people often tend to think that “if a person becomes super rich, that’s an indicator of great competence”. But it’s not a reliable indicator of competence in other fields (besides becoming and staying rich).

    But sadly I must discourage high level meta-discussion in this community.

    • If there’s an experiment or discovery that the source introduces, and scientific methods have been used to study it - please do.
    • But journalistic critique of the state of science communication - I believe there must be a better forum for it somewhere. But I will keep it here too, because I currently don’t know where that better forum might be located on Lemmy.
  • Tramort@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    This video is amazing, but I agree about the repetition.

    My guess is that it’s an editing oversight, and she doesn’t know she had the same prose in two different sections.