• mc900ftJesus@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    That’s a terrible counter argument. “Oh maybe he meant something different, you might not know the context surrounding how he plainly said it in 8 different ways you just quoted”

    Is this what Christian academia is like? How pathetic.

    • xthexder@l.sw0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s certainly an argument I’ve heard a lot when talking about inconsistencies in the Bible. Usually it’s blamed on translation, missing context, or exaggerated retellings. It was written by many different people who weren’t necessarily talking to each other after all. I have a hard time taking any of it seriously.

      • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        But not this bit of the bible. There can’t be any translation errors, missing context or exaggeration on this bit specifically because we like this bit.

        • theangryseal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          A gay made me uncomfortable. That was god talking to me, you know. :/

          That’s the thing that bothers me most with religious folks.

          Their feelings are interpreted as the will of god.

    • pimento64@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      “This person held this opinion”

      “There are several reasons that may be an inaccurate and reductive account of that person’s opinions and of historical events in general”

      “Okay but, for real, that’s so wishy washy bro. Context? That’s just, like, a term. How pathetic.”

      You’re making a great case for the Catholic Church burning uneducated people alive for voicing opinions.