fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 9 个月前moms rulemander.xyzimagemessage-square91linkfedilinkarrow-up1983arrow-down114
arrow-up1969arrow-down1imagemoms rulemander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 9 个月前message-square91linkfedilink
minus-squareIllecors@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·9 个月前This assumes a single child per set of parents, doesn’t it?
minus-squareSkunkWorkz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-29 个月前No I’m talking about the amount of ancestors in the 80th generation back not the total amount of ancestors. It doesn’t matter how many children each set of parents had for that number.
This assumes a single child per set of parents, doesn’t it?
No I’m talking about the amount of ancestors in the 80th generation back not the total amount of ancestors. It doesn’t matter how many children each set of parents had for that number.