• Cris@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Thats very true. And the start of stricter gun laws in California was under Ronald Regan when he was governor, in response to groups like the black panthers arming themselves

      • Aliendelarge@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        While its true Reagan was governer then and supported it, all he really did was sign a veto proof bipartisan bill from the California Legislature. Lets not forget those others like Don Mulford and John Knox.

    • Please_Do_Not@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah, in a modern police state, owning a firearm isn’t gonna help once you’re in their sights. If you think it will, that just means you’re being brought in cold rather than doing time.

      I’m all for self protection, though, and ensuring that it isn’t only the right who’s armed.

      • leftytighty@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Like most things, this kind of thing works at scale. You’re not going to have a shootout with police and FBI and drive away like GTA, but we’ve seen time and again from both sides of the political spectrum that police will change their behavior when a community or protest is full of guns.

        No matter what the action is it needs to be collective action. This is why organizing is the most important thing, more than guns, more than theory, more than protest.