Energy in physics feels analogous to money in economics. Is a manmade medium of exchange used for convenience. It is the exchange medium between measureable physical states/things.

Is energy is real in the same way money is? An incredibly useful accounting trick that is used so frequently it feels fundamental, but really it’s just a mathmatical convenience?

Small aside: From this perspective ‘conservatipn of energy’ is a redundant statement. Of course energy must be conserved or else the equations are wrong. The definition of energy is it’s conservation.

  • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I guess we can’t answer OP’s question, then. That’s too unspecific. Something gets exchanged, true. Is that man-made? Likely false, but depends on what we’re talking about.

    • Yondoza@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      A medium of exchange for force.

      A photon of a certain wavelength imparts a known force when colliding with an electron. That force propels the electron to a higher orbital.

      • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        And how does the “manmade” tie into that? Did we make the photons? Exert the force or did we do something that brought force into existence?