Canada’s largest Muslim organisation is outraged over a bill introduced by the Quebec government that would ban headscarves for school support staff and students.

“In Quebec, we made the decision that state and the religion are separate,” said Education Minister Bernard Drainville, CBC News reported. “And today, we say the public schools are separate from religion.”

But the National Council of Canadian Muslims (NCCM), who are challenging in the Supreme Court the original bill that forbids religious symbols being worn by teachers, say the new bill is another infringement on their rights and unfairly targets hijab-wearing Muslims.

“This renewed attack on the fundamental rights of our community is just one of several recent actions taken by this historically unpopular government to bolster their poll numbers by attacking the rights of Muslim Canadians,” the NCCM said in a social media post.

  • Underfreyja@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    They’re not, the CAQ is nothing but hypocrites on the subject. They excluded Christians symbols from the get go.

    • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      They excluded religious items that didn’t shove oppressive symbolism in people’s faces. Get your facts straight.

      • Shezzagrad@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        No body was enslaved due to the power of the hijab. Christian pedophiles and their obsession with the cross did use the cross as a power symbol. Interesting how racist and dumb you are

        • Ricky Rigatoni@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I mean. Women in theocratic islamic states get arrested and assaulted if they don’t wear their hijab. This is a pretty well documented fact.

          • Shezzagrad@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Like Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, Iran and Libya?

            Let’s see, house of Saud was supported by the British as an friendly clan who then took over most of arabia and when a king acted against American/British values they got couped

            For afganistan look at operation Cyclone, most of these terror groups or their predecessors were funded by America to take out the potentially socialist leaning afganistan among many other nation which later backfired on the American govt

            Iran has a democracy under mossadeq until he nationalised oil, made Britain big made, told daddy America it’s communism, mossadeq was couped with the Shah, the people then couped the Shah with the islamic fundamentalist among other funding from again America.

            Libya had ghaddafi who wasnt no saint by libya thrived under him. America invaded and now it has open slave markets

            There’s a something that’s similar about all these stories I can’t get by hear around…

            Why is Indonesia, Malaysia, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Jordan, Lebanon, turkey, Tunisia not killing or arresting women for hijab? That’s a far far bigger amount of Muslims?

          • IndustryStandard@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Well documented by your comment?

            Saudi had their Esports covered by women without hijabs. Even when watching Youtube videos about tourists visiting Iran you see plenty of women without hijab.