• M. Orange@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Just in case anyone didn’t feel like reading the article, here’s the last (and imo most important) paragraph:

    However, without changing the DMCA, we can’t expect to see real, lasting change in this space. Doctorow said as much to me: “What we really need to do is get rid of DMCA 1201, that law that makes it a crime to format shift your media…it’s the same law that stops farmers from fixing their tractors, blocks independent mechanics from fixing your car, stops rivals from setting up alternative app stores for phones and games consoles…this law is a menace!”

    • Chahk@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 days ago

      Good guy Meta. Fighting for us little guys, downloading terabytes of books, defending against lawsuits. Maybe they’ll overturn DMCA?

      /s

  • orcrist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 days ago

    It’s interesting when people are put to the choice. On the one hand they could purchase a book with DRM that they don’t actually own. On the other hand, they could look for alternative means by which to obtain the book. And the more the publishers f*** with you, the more you might be inclined to never give them a penny.

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      How can they catch people who have produced unlocked epubs? There are plenty of ways if they have your device at some future date.

      I suppose the easiest predictable thing other than having your device seized when you’re entering the country for example or when you get arrested for example is that back doors could be installed on Android or iPhone that look for unapproved media.

      The technology is already good enough for that. It’s only a question of implementation.

      • Taleya@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        I’m too fucken old to read a book on a goddamn phone screen and my eco reader is too old to enshittify. Mwahahahahha i am untouchable

  • StarlightDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    Sadly its not doable with Kindle and Linux anymore. I buy my ebooks since I only read indie but I will only do it from Itch or other DRM free sites.

  • ctkatz@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    i’m glad that there is an(other) program for audible. i like this one better. it automatically converts to a file format i prefer and downloads my books immediately, which is convenient for preorders. besides that, i personally would like to not use the audible app for playback; this is just a personal preference though. i have an audiobook app that works just as well. if anything this would just be me eliminating an app from my devices than anything else.

  • spacecadet@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    I would if I could, but Kindles new DRM can get around DeDRM. Waiting for an update. Trying to find a new way to buy books but seems like you just get locked into someone else DRM, which may have less support around DRM removal

  • lka1988@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    135
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Removing DRM has always been “illegal”.

    However: German concentration camps were legal, while families protecting Jewish citizens from being taken to said concentration camps was strictly illegal.

    What’s legal is not always right (ethically and morally), and what’s right is not always legal. Remember that.

    • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      7 days ago

      Sometimes doing something illegal is anti-social behavior. Sometimes it’s anti-authoritarian behavior. These are not the same thing.

    • Yingwu@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      I’d like to clarify that removing DRM does lie in a grey zone in many countries, including in the US due to some court rulings. In some countries the right to make a backup of your e-book might have priority over copyright law for example.

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        7 days ago

        The DMCA makes it pretty clear that “Circumvention of Technological Protection Measures” is illegal. There are no exceptions for whether you own or redistribute the content in question.

        • Pirata@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          I don’t care what some stupid US law says. It doesn’t apply to me.

            • Pirata@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              It really wasn’t.

              You tried to make it about the US when the topic is about a company that operates internationally, that’s what.

              Personally, I wouldn’t be surprised is breaking national law in many countries with their one-size-fits-all approach.

              But I’d rather just not give a crap about that and just keep pirating my books.

              • Ulrich@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                6 days ago

                It really was. Do you not know what the DMCA is? It’s US law.

        • Delzur@vegantheoryclub.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          It’s not needed.

          If another law says you have a right to create backups of digital content you own, then two laws are in conflict. Why would dcma have precedence?

          No idea about US, but in some countries it would be up to judges, and with enough rulings it would be settled one way or another.

          • Neshura@bookwormstory.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            6 days ago

            At least here in Germany the bypassing of DRM is so legal they don’t even try to get you for it. The only thing they ever go after nowadays is distributing and consuming that cracked content (get logless VPN and that problem solves itself). But if you go and rip Netflix movies for your own enjoyment they have no leg to stand on in court unless you distribute it.

          • psud@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            7 days ago

            Aussie copyright law gives us the right to circumvent protections in order to make copies to watch on a device the original can’t be played on.

            Linux out of the box is remarkably incompatible with DRM protected content and so makes an excellent thing on which one might want to watch, listen to, or read a thing

          • Ulrich@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            7 days ago

            If another law says you have a right to create

            That law doesn’t exist and that’s not how law works. Law does not specify what is allowed, only what isn’t. Breaking encryption isn’t.

            • DaTingGoBrrr@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              7 days ago

              It exists in Sweden. We are allowed to make private copies of movies, music and whatever. If I want to rip a CD and give it to my family and friends that is 100% legal. But it’s not legal to sell the copies.

                • DaTingGoBrrr@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  Many European countries (and companies there in) listen to and respect DMCA takedown requests and my point is that it does not apply to individuals. So yes, it applies in Sweden too. Maybe after Trump is done destroying the diplomatic relationships with Europe we can finally start not giving a shit about DMCA.

            • shinxir@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              The right for a private good exists. In the same way different countries exist, different views in copyright and the right to backup exists.

      • lka1988@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        7 days ago

        Sure, but companies who employ DRM have argued against that grey area since DRM was a thing. Something something IP/copyright/licensing/whatever bullshit… IMO: fuck you, I bought it, I own it, eat shit.

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          Correct… How are they going to enforce their “property” rights when I do it at home?

          These corpo parasites are delulu hence why I stopped spending money on media.

          Get fucked.