• El Barto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    You’re comparing two different things.

    Of course I can reflect on how I came with a math result.

    “Wait, how did you come up with 4 when I asked you 2+2?”

    You can confidently say: “well, my teacher said it once and I’m just parroting it.” Or “I pictured two fingers in my mind, then pictured two more fingers and then I counted them.” Or “I actually thought that I’d say some random number, came up with 4 because it’s my favorite digit, said it and it was pure coincidence that it was correct!”

    Whereas it doesn’t seem like Claude can’t do this.

    Of course, you could ask me “what’s the physical/chemical process your neurons follow for you to form those four fingers you picture in your mind?” And I would tell you I don’t know. But again, that’s a different thing.

    • shneancy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      yeah i was referring more to the chemical reactions. the 2+2 example is not the best one but langauge itself is a great case study. once you get fluent enough at any langauge everything just flows, you have a thought and then you compose words to describe it, and the reverse is true, you hear something and your brain just understands. How do we do any of that? no idea

      • El Barto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Understood. And yeah, language is definitely an interesting topic. “Why do you say ‘So be it’ instead of ‘So is it’?” Most people will say “I don’t know… all I know if that it sounds correct.” Someone will say “it’s because it’s a preterite preposition past imperfect incantation tense used with an composition participle around-the-clock flush adverb, so clearly you must use the subjunctive in this case.” But that’s after studying it years later.