• KobaCumTribute [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Didn’t it also go along with privatizing tractors and generally fucking up agriculture with that, since it became a clusterfuck to maintain and repair them when that was the responsibility of individual farmers instead of having centralized facilities for it?

    • Findom_DeLuise [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yup [CW: NATOpedia]

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikita_Khrushchev#Agricultural_policy

      Khrushchev sought to abolish the Machine-Tractor Stations (MTS) which not only owned most large agricultural machines such as combines and tractors but also provided services such as plowing, and transfer their equipment and functions to the kolkhozes and sovkhozes (state farms).[159] After a successful test involving MTS which served one large kolkhoz each, Khrushchev ordered a gradual transition—but then ordered that the change take place with great speed.[160] Within three months, over half of the MTS facilities had been closed, and kolkhozes were being required to buy the equipment, with no discount given for older or dilapidated machines.[161] MTS employees, unwilling to bind themselves to kolkhozes and lose their state employee benefits and the right to change their jobs, fled to the cities, creating a shortage of skilled operators.[162] The costs of the machinery, plus the costs of building storage sheds and fuel tanks for the equipment, impoverished many kolkhozes. Inadequate provisions were made for repair stations.[163] Without the MTS, the market for Soviet agricultural equipment fell apart, as the kolkhozes now had neither the money nor skilled buyers to purchase new equipment.[164]