Protestation@discuss.tchncs.deB to Communism@lemmy.ml · 2 months agoProtestationlemmy.mlimagemessage-square28linkfedilinkarrow-up1119arrow-down12
arrow-up1117arrow-down1imageProtestationlemmy.mlProtestation@discuss.tchncs.deB to Communism@lemmy.ml · 2 months agomessage-square28linkfedilink
minus-squareDessalines@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up6·2 months agoScientist would absolutely consider themselves newtonians, as his theories have been so thoroughly proven and tested, as to be accepted as fact. The scientific outlook is exactly the opposite of what you describe, which is to build on and extend previous terminology as becomes necessary.
minus-squareDagwood222@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down5·2 months agoThat’s a lot of work to avoid dealing the actual issue at hand.
minus-squarebitjunkie@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months agoIt looks like a lot of bloviating about nomenclature instead of practical matters.
Scientist would absolutely consider themselves newtonians, as his theories have been so thoroughly proven and tested, as to be accepted as fact.
The scientific outlook is exactly the opposite of what you describe, which is to build on and extend previous terminology as becomes necessary.
That’s a lot of work to avoid dealing the actual issue at hand.
It looks like a lot of bloviating about nomenclature instead of practical matters.