Protestation@discuss.tchncs.deB to Communism@lemmy.ml · 19 天前Protestationlemmy.mlimagemessage-square30linkfedilinkarrow-up1118arrow-down12
arrow-up1116arrow-down1imageProtestationlemmy.mlProtestation@discuss.tchncs.deB to Communism@lemmy.ml · 19 天前message-square30linkfedilink
minus-squareDessalines@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up6·18 天前Scientist would absolutely consider themselves newtonians, as his theories have been so thoroughly proven and tested, as to be accepted as fact. The scientific outlook is exactly the opposite of what you describe, which is to build on and extend previous terminology as becomes necessary.
minus-squareDagwood222@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down5·18 天前That’s a lot of work to avoid dealing the actual issue at hand.
minus-squarebitjunkie@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·15 天前It looks like a lot of bloviating about nomenclature instead of practical matters.
Scientist would absolutely consider themselves newtonians, as his theories have been so thoroughly proven and tested, as to be accepted as fact.
The scientific outlook is exactly the opposite of what you describe, which is to build on and extend previous terminology as becomes necessary.
That’s a lot of work to avoid dealing the actual issue at hand.
It looks like a lot of bloviating about nomenclature instead of practical matters.