• Yaky@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 天前

    To configure most suckless tools you need to… recompile them. The readme says:

    Because dwm is customized through editing its source code, it’s pointless to make binary packages of it. This keeps its userbase small and elitist. No novices asking stupid questions.

    But if you are trying to compile suckless tools, you are already in too deep.

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 天前

      Wow. Just wow. What a bunch of utter darlings. Just let them stew in their own idiocy.

      Edit: To clarify, I mean the people who wrote this readme.

    • DefederateLemmyMl@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 天前

      LOL yes, I had a look at those too when I was looking for a more minimal terminal. Noped the fuck out when I read you had to recompile the tools to configure them.

      It’s not that this is beyond my skill level, but that is just so … why would I want to do that?

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      3 天前

      You need to edit a C header file used as a config file, and run make and use the resulting executable file. That hardly keeps out anyone.

      At the same time DWM is very convenient, and so was WMII.

      • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 天前

        I know how to compile my own software, but I’m not gonna fucking do it. I’ll leave a comment where I can calling the devs lazy assholes (because they are) and move on with life, as will many others

        Because that’s unnecessary elitism, and it’s gross. Also, 1 step of extra work is bullshit and wastes human life for no fuckin reason

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 天前

          If you’ve seen suckless tools, the whole point is that they are rudimentary. DWM is one header file and one source code file of ~2k lines.

          It’s not lazy because having a config file wouldn’t add anything to using those things, and it’s not elitism or gross because it’s not hard for those who understand why’d they use suckless tools at all. It also contributes to atmosphere.

          FFS, please stop trying to press other people to do things your way, that’s what’s gross.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 天前

          Something having an X-Wing pic keeps out a lot of people too, cause not everyone likes Star Wars. What’s your point?

      • Yaky@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 天前

        I don’t find it difficult, and have enjoyed sxmo on the PinePhone. I understand the suckless approach, but I do have to admit that many people that I know, even tech-savvy ones, probably would not want to rebuild to configure something.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 天前

          probably would not want to rebuild to configure something.

          It builds in a second. About DWM. It’s 2k lines of C code, all they do is basic functionality. It’s not some cumbersome process of setting up an environment, and then looking at running lines of compiler output as if you were some fscking Neo installing Gentoo.