Has started to grind my gears, since there is no way to quickly explain that I’m happy with the current situation (I live in the nordics, not the US). Historically I would be considered a conservative, since I don’t see a need to progress (atleast at an accelerated rate). However that term is now used to define reactionaries, which are people who reacting to the changing society wants to regress to a earlier time.

Why must we change the meanings of such obvious words?

  • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 天前

    Living in the US, I think a large part of why we can’t seem to agree on anything politically is because we’re using separate definitions depending on which perspective it’s from. It makes conversations impossible.

    • StinkyFingerItchyBum@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 天前

      That is the deliberate strategy of the right. They weaponize language and use it disingenuously to obfuscate meaning and confuse debate.

      Everyone else more or less tries to communicate honestly.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 天前

      We agreed on pro-life/pro-choice rather then having people insist on pro-life/anti-life and pro-choice/anti-choice.