• Iceman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Nick Adams (gender in name) is declaring that he is one step form communism. .

  • Valmond@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I’m at “boneless wings” but we don’t have that where I live, how can I get to the next level?

  • Holyginz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    13 hours ago

    If alpha and beta were an actual thing, putting alpha male in parenthesis next to your name would be the most beta thing you could do, lol.

    • Doctor_Satan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Nick Adams once said on Twitter that Alpha males never have to announce that they are Alpha males, with (Alpha male) right there in his name. For the longest time, I refused to believe he wasn’t a parody account. Then I looked into him, and the dude is 100% serious. Some people are just impossibly stupid.

      This is the tweet I was thinking of, but while looking for it, I was reminded that he mentions his Alpha status all the fucking time.

    • Jax@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I joke with my girlfriend all the time about how ‘I’M A MAN!’

      Like yes, we get it - you are very insecure about the little guy in between your legs. Let’s get those trans kids some rights so you can get some testosterone replacement. It’s very easy, step one step two.

  • peteyestee@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Okay… What’s the deal with boneless wings? I’ve noticed guys looking at me different at Buffalo wild wings.

    • Bieren@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      51 minutes ago

      Nothing. I do like good bone in wing. But nothing wrong with boneless for the days I don’t want to have to take a shower after eating to get sauce out of my beard. It’s basically people just being afraid of their own feelings or unsure of their own sexuality that have an issue with them.

    • AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      This confuses me because BWW has cauliflower wings which is clearly the cuck soy boy choice. (It’s me, I’m the soy boy, but I usually go with the black bean burger.)

    • bss03@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      15 hours ago

      It’s “choosing the easy option” and “being soft”. There’s no deeper meaning that I can discern.

      Evidently, “real men” choose “hardship” so they are ready when “hardship” chooses them?

      Also I think the pictured “(Alpha Male)” account is intentional satire of the Tates of the world.

      • Famko@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Unfortunately the account isn’t satire and he actually believes the things he’s posting.

    • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Real men pay extra for half the food and have to wipe there hands every 15 seconds so they can touch things without getting sauce everywhere.

      Boneless is inherently superior because I love boobies and therefore only eat breast.

    • trashboat@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I honestly prefer boneless, not that I don’t like a good bone-in wing now and again. I suppose there’s some weird masculine pride that dudes get eating bone-in wings, and eating boneless goes against that?

      • Doctor_Satan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I prefer bone-in because I prefer dark meat. I also like the crispy skin more than breading. When I do get a craving for white meat chicken nuggets, I’ll make them myself and won’t toss them in sauce. It makes the breading soggy.

    • The Menemen!@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      Turks are the perfect alphas confirmed (we don’t have gender in our language). He, she, it, all the same to us.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Unlike the beta Chinese, who didn’t have gendered pronouns in their language but made them up to appease Western betas smh my head.

        • The Menemen!@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          The situation of trans peoplem in Turkey is interesting. They were much more dominant part of society much earlier than in the west. It was completly normal in many parts of Istanbul to see trans people in the 1980s already. Trans people were also big part of pop culture quite early, Bülent Ersoy for example became a trans superstar in the 1980s. Gender change is legal since 1988 (much earlier than many EU countries).

          At the same time, there defintly are a lot of social repercussions against trans people.

          It is quite the mixed pack tbh.

    • floo@retrolemmy.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Yeah, the guy who thought a ~10 year break in genociding lgbtq people was “a bit much”.

    • MithranArkanere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Yeah. Tankies always forget you can’t have socialism without democracy, and either no government or a government that is strictly from the bottom up, and fascists gladly play along with that facade as it works in their interests.

      “Authoritarian communism” is an oxymoron.

      And not an “emphasis” kind of oxymoron like “bittersweet” or “impossible solution”, or a “poetic” kind like “living dead”.
      An “absolutely impossible” kind of oxymoron. like “married bachelor” or “squared circle”.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        22 hours ago

        “Authoritarian communism” is an oxymoron.

        The definition of “Authoritarianism” seems to be bound up in the libertarian view of free markets versus unfree governments.

        There’s a book I like called The People’s Republic of Walmart. It describes how much of the Command Economy practiced in the 60s and 70s by “authoritarian” socialist states was picked up and integrated into the corporate model in an effort to improve efficiency of supply chains and reduce the cost of industrial manufacturing. Walmart’s vertical integration follows a model that any Socialist government would laud. It just hordes the surplus for shareholders, at the expense of its employment base.

        When the Socialists were making cars in Yugoslavia with a highly efficient regional distribution of manufacturing and assembly, it was horrifying infringement on the rights of the business community. When Ford and Nissian picked up on these practices and imported them to the US and Japan, it was The Miracle of Free Market Innovation that delivered huge returns to investors.

        Liberals love to cringe and wring their hands when they hear about Lenin’s “Dictatorship of the Proletariat”. After all, how can we be free if worker’s council get to dictate our housing stock or our employment opportunities or our transit corridors or our retail inventory? But they’re utterly blaise about living under an economy whose function is dictated by a handful of corporate boards and banking executives making all the same decisions because… freedom?

        • rockerface 🇺🇦@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Soviets removed the “proletariat” from the dictatorship very quickly. About the same time when Lenin decided he didn’t like losing elections or having any sort of political opposition whatsoever.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Soviets removed the “proletariat” from the dictatorship very quickly.

            That’s the western liberal line, certainly. The victory of the Leninists and Maoists transformed oppressed into oppressor by virtue of no longer having an aristocracy capable of oppressing them.

            About the same time when Lenin decided he didn’t like losing elections

            The elections failed to deliver the promised reform. Their biggest promise on taking office was to exit the war and withdraw the troops. And the first thing the Mensheviks did was double-down on defeat. Milyukov’s refusal to exit the Eastern Front kicked off a protest half-a-million men large, right in the heart of the Russian government.

            The next three months saw the elected government ordering police into the streets to slaughter hundreds of the people who voted for them. They topped it off by bombing the Bolshevik offices and chasing Lenin back underground for the unconscionable crime of leading peace marches. Bolshevism surged in popularity the following month, to the point that General Lavr Kornilov threatened to bring troops into the city to conduct a full pogrom. Only mass defection within the lower ranks of the military spared Petrograd from an outright holocaust.

            This is the democracy you’re defending? Christ. No wonder so many liberals seem perfectly content to see the modern wave of college students being disappeared by ICE.

            • metaldream@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 hours ago

              Ah right, democracy didn’t immediately solve all problems so we should ban or murder all political opposition and install a one party dictatorship where I’m conveniently in charge of everything.

              Sounds like something that totally benefits “the people”.

        • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          But if we dislike those corporate policies, does that mean we also dislike the socialist policies they are mimicking?

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Are you complaining about the efficient supply chains and low cost-per-unit of production?

            Or are you complaining about the high degree of profit-taking and the denial of public benefits to the working class?

            • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Efficiency and low-cost comes with baggage too, so I guess both in a way. Efficiency and low cost good, but what is required to achieve those often sucks

              The second thing is undeniably bad

      • rtxn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        He didn’t get called “man of steel”, good old Iosif Vissarionovich Dzhugashvili called himself that just to massage his ego. Kind of like certified Most Fuckable Twink Nick Adams proclaiming himself to be an “alpha male”.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          That guy certainly isn’t an “alpha male,” but calling him “fuckable” is going way too far.

          • forrgott@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            Well, that’s only if you buy into the myth that “alpha male” is even real. If say he is “alpha male” in that he exemplifies an imaginary concept…

            • grue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              18 hours ago

              Look, I’m just saying, to be the “certified Most Fuckable Twink” being infinitely submissive isn’t enough; you’ve got to be attractive too. This asshole meets that first criterion, but absolutely fails on the second.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          16 hours ago

          So he’s a self-made man of steel? Even better! It seems Iosif Vissarionovich Dzhugashvili was truly a sigma male.

    • r00ty@kbin.life
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      If you have to tell everyone, you’re not it. Having said that, it must be a parody account. Tell me it is.

      • Doctor_Satan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Hilariously, it’s not a parody account.

        If you have to tell everyone, you’re not it.

        You mean like this?

        • r00ty@kbin.life
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          OK now see, if I saw that I’d think it was a parody. With the alpha male, right there in the name still.

      • Ekybio@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        23 hours ago

        From what I have seen in the past, that is unironically his account and yes, self proclamimed title.

        But since every right-winger is a parody on some level, it might not even matter, because they do stuff like that either way…

        • LeFrog@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          21 hours ago

          since every right-winger is a parody on some level

          Poe’s Law, but inverse?

          We also need something like a Poe’s Law part two: send Trumpet into exile. Let a man have hope.

      • fraksken@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Any man who must say ‘I am the king’ is no true king.” – Tywin Lannister to a furious Joffrey Baratheon in front of his small council.

        • Doctor_Satan@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Any man who must say ‘I am the king’ is no true king.

          I mean Nick Adams has basically said as much himself.