• Wanpieserino@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    For example this place: they have to rent this area in the center of the capital. That’s not cheap for them. There’s plenty of employees inside the restaurant.

    • Tja@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      But if burger King wasn’t there, another restaurant would be in that place, paying that rent and salaries. There’s nothing unique about burger King that creates net new jobs. They didn’t build that building. Or anything for that matter. They don’t have some kind of unique technology or product. They don’t enable any new processes or offer new capabilities to anyone. If that place was owned by “aunt Marie Burgers and Frites” it would be a net positive for the area and the country.

      • Wanpieserino@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        Money coming inside of Belgium is a good thing. It funds development. This building has a renter. Aunt Marie burgers and frites’ money is being used elsewhere in the country for other development.

        The pie got larger.

        China became relevant because of foreign capital. Nothing else.

        We should motivate foreigners to pour their capital into Europe.

        • Tja@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          There is no capital moving in. It’s not a new factory. It’s not a new technology. It’s not a novel product that didn’t exist before. They don’t even export anything. They pay the rent with money from their customers, just like anyone paying taxes in Belgium would. There is only capital moving out.

          • Wanpieserino@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            So from a bit of research. The place is owned by Carl Goris. Someone living in Brussels. 99,5% of burger Kings worldwide are owned by franchisees.

            So about 6 to 10% of the revenue goes to USA.

            It’s up to you to decide if you think boycotting 90 to 94% local revenue to hinder 6 to 10% USA revenue is worth it.

            • Tja@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              It’s not boycotting local revenue. It’s going to the kebab place or pizzeria that leaves 100% of their revenue in Europe.

              • Wanpieserino@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 hours ago

                Aight you’re right, in this case there’s no capital inflow. Franchisees will stop using American branding if it doesn’t bring them customers