Alphane Moon@lemmy.worldM to Hardware@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoPhilips debuts 3D printable components to repair productswww.tomshardware.comexternal-linkmessage-square91linkfedilinkarrow-up1684arrow-down15cross-posted to: 3dprinting@lemmy.worldright2repair@discuss.tchncs.de
arrow-up1679arrow-down1external-linkPhilips debuts 3D printable components to repair productswww.tomshardware.comAlphane Moon@lemmy.worldM to Hardware@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square91linkfedilinkcross-posted to: 3dprinting@lemmy.worldright2repair@discuss.tchncs.de
minus-squarejagged_circle@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·1 day agoPretty sure it would be better if they didn’t release anything at all. Then I wouldn’t be breaking the law if I sold both their product and replacement parts for their product
minus-squarejagged_circle@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·1 day agoIts NC. The license makes that illegal
minus-squareTja@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 hours agoIf they released nothing you wouldn’t be breaking the law because you wouldn’t be selling it. You still have to option of not selling it.
minus-squarejagged_circle@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·34 minutes agoAnd just take a loss on the filament? That’s dumb.
Pretty sure it would be better if they didn’t release anything at all. Then I wouldn’t be breaking the law if I sold both their product and replacement parts for their product
You can still do that
Its NC. The license makes that illegal
If they released nothing you wouldn’t be breaking the law because you wouldn’t be selling it.
You still have to option of not selling it.
And just take a loss on the filament? That’s dumb.